Reference frames for photon collisions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relativistic analysis of photon collisions, specifically focusing on the reference frames of the involved photons. Participants explore how to determine the relativistic beta (v/c) and gamma (1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)) factors in two different center of mass frames for the photons.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the setup involving three photons with specific 4-momenta and two reference frames, seeking to find the relativistic parameters beta and gamma.
  • Another participant suggests using the Lorentz transformation for energy and momentum to relate the quantities in different frames.
  • There is a clarification from a participant regarding the variables beta and gamma, emphasizing the need to determine beta.
  • A later reply proposes that there is only one variable to solve for, beta, and provides a relationship between beta and gamma.
  • One participant discusses the need to replace 3-vectors with 4-vectors and mentions the energy component in relation to the momentum of the photons.
  • Another participant notes that the components of the combined momenta must relate through a Lorentz transformation, while questioning the interest in the direction of the Lorentz boost.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches to the problem, and while there are suggestions and clarifications, no consensus is reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of dealing with photons in relativistic contexts, highlighting the challenge of determining relative velocities when only photons are involved. There are also references to the need for specific components of the 4-momenta and the implications of using Lorentz transformations.

hartin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My question probably has a simple answer, but I've been scratching my
head over it a little too long so I thought I would ask it here. I
have three initial photons involved in a collision with 4-momenta k1,
k2 and k3. I have two reference frames:

frame 1: the centre of mass frame of photons k1 and k2 (so that 3-momenta k1+k2=0)

frame 2: the centre of mass frame of all photons k1, k2 and k3 (sothat 3-momenta k1+k2+k3=0)

I want to find out what the relativistic beta v/c and gamma 1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 are. So there seems no way to directly find the relative velocity of the two frames is as only photons are involved. I thought
to use the expression for the relativistic doppler shift, but that doesn't seem appropriate.

Can anyone help me out here?

cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using the Lorentz transformation for energy and momentum. That is, if an object (including a photon) has energy E and momentum p in one frame, then in another frame with relative velocity v (with respect to the first frame):

[tex]p^{\prime}c = \gamma (pc - \beta E)[/tex]

[tex]E^{\prime} = \gamma (E - \beta pc)[/tex]
 
thanks, but [tex]\beta[/tex] and [tex]\delta[/tex] are what I'm trying to determine
 
err I meant beta and gamma
 
hartin said:
Hi,

My question probably has a simple answer, but I've been scratching my
head over it a little too long so I thought I would ask it here. I
have three initial photons involved in a collision with 4-momenta k1,
k2 and k3. I have two reference frames:

frame 1: the centre of mass frame of photons k1 and k2 (so that 3-momenta k1+k2=0)

frame 2: the centre of mass frame of all photons k1, k2 and k3 (sothat 3-momenta k1+k2+k3=0)

I want to find out what the relativistic beta v/c and gamma 1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 are. So there seems no way to directly find the relative velocity of the two frames is as only photons are involved. I thought
to use the expression for the relativistic doppler shift, but that doesn't seem appropriate.

Can anyone help me out here?

cheers.
Use: P=k3
E=k1+k2+k3
LT with \beta=p/E in the direction of k3.
 
hartin said:
Hi,

My question probably has a simple answer, but I've been scratching my
head over it a little too long so I thought I would ask it here. I
have three initial photons involved in a collision with 4-momenta k1,
k2 and k3. I have two reference frames:

frame 1: the centre of mass frame of photons k1 and k2 (so that 3-momenta k1+k2=0)

frame 2: the centre of mass frame of all photons k1, k2 and k3 (sothat 3-momenta k1+k2+k3=0)

I want to find out what the relativistic beta v/c and gamma 1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 are. So there seems no way to directly find the relative velocity of the two frames is as only photons are involved. I thought
to use the expression for the relativistic doppler shift, but that doesn't seem appropriate.

Can anyone help me out here?

cheers.

Note that you have only one variable to solve for, [itex]\beta[/itex]. By definition,

[tex]\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}[/tex]

You can (and will have to) invert this to solve for beta as a function of gamma.

If I understand the problem correctly, you have 6 3-vectors as input? I.e. you have the components of k1 in frame1 and frame2, the components of k2 in frame1 and frame2, and the components of k3 in frame 1 and frame 2.

I suppose you could call these k1 and k1', k2 and k2', k3 and k3'?

First step: replace the 3-vectors with 4-vectors. The "missing" component, which is energy, can be found from |k1| = |k2| = |k3| = 0, i.e. E^2 - |p|^2 = 0.

k1 + k2 must be related by a Lorentz transform to (k1'+k2'), because k1' is the Lorentz transform of k1, and k2' is the Lorentz transform of k2.

In geometric units, we know that the components of (k1+k2) are (1,0,0,0). In standard units, this would be (c,0,0,0).

The zeroeth. component of (k1'+k2') will be gamma in geometric units, or c * gamma in standard units.You apparently are not interested in solving for the direction of the Lorentz boost, just it's absolute value?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K