Reflection and refraction of light problem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to the reflection and refraction of light through a rectangular slab. Participants are trying to calculate the distance light travels inside the slab (L) and the lateral displacement (x) based on given parameters like the incident angle and the width of the slab. There is confusion about how to apply Snell's law and the geometry of the situation, particularly regarding the behavior of light at different angles of incidence. One participant suggests constructing a triangle to visualize the problem better, while another highlights the importance of understanding the critical angle for refraction. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in diagrams and the application of mathematical principles to solve the problem effectively.
bbangel615
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




3. Assume the slab is perfectly rectangular and has width W.
(a) Calculate the distance (L) the light travels INSIDE the block as a function of W and the angle t1.
(b) From the right-angled triangle with vertices IPE calculate the lateral displacement x in terms of the incident and reflected angles and the width of the sample.
(c) If the incident angle is 60 degree, n=1.81, and W= 8.0 cm, what is x?

4.)

Homework Equations




They mentioned Snell's law and how transmitted ray is parallel to the incident ray. n1sin(O1)=n2sing(02) 0=delta or whatever the circle with a little curve on the top is called. a diagram is attached.

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't get this. help:(
 

Attachments

  • phsyics.jpg
    phsyics.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 703
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The picture is really poor quality, but let's see if I deciphered it correctly.

So I'm assuming L is the length of the Refracted wave and that's what you want to find based on the width W and angle you shine the laser at, right?

So Let's take the two extreme cases. You shine the light right into the slab at a normal interface, so it's not at an angle at all. Based on that picture, you can see that the laser will go straight through the slab and come out the other side, right? Now if you lay the slab flat and shine the laser across it, it will just skim the surface and really never come out the other side, right? Basically you get "infinity".

Well, how do you get infinities? By dividing by a number that gets closer and closer to zero, right? That's pretty much the only real way of getting it.

So... you have a number W and dividing it by something can give you either W back at 0 degrees or infinity at 90 degrees. Do you know of a function that is 1 at 0 degrees and 0 at 90 degrees?
 
Hi Poop-Loops,

Poop-Loops said:
The picture is really poor quality, but let's see if I deciphered it correctly.

So I'm assuming L is the length of the Refracted wave and that's what you want to find based on the width W and angle you shine the laser at, right?

So Let's take the two extreme cases. You shine the light right into the slab at a normal interface, so it's not at an angle at all. Based on that picture, you can see that the laser will go straight through the slab and come out the other side, right? Now if you lay the slab flat and shine the laser across it, it will just skim the surface and really never come out the other side, right? Basically you get "infinity".

No, I don't think that's right. If the incident ray is right at 90 degrees to the normal, the ray that refracts in will be less than 90 degrees; in fact it will be at the critical angle for that material in air. The length of the refracted ray inside will be finite.

I think a good approach here for part a would be to construct a triangle with the length L as one of the sides.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
929
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K