Reflexes, Reaction Time and inertia

AI Thread Summary
Reaction time and reflexes are influenced by inertia primarily in the physical response rather than the neural impulses. Increased mass or inertia can lead to a delay in physical actions, as heavier limbs or objects slow down muscular responses. The molecular dynamics of ion movement and membrane properties also play a role in signal transmission speed along neurons, but these factors remain constant. The discussion emphasizes that while neural initiation is unaffected, the physical execution of a reaction is hindered by increased inertia. Overall, understanding the relationship between inertia and reaction time is crucial for analyzing physical responses.
Mt. Nixion
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
How is reaction time/reflexes affected by inertia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would probably depend upon how you define 'reaction time'. It has no effect upon the neural impulses necessary to initiate a reaction. There will, however, be an increased delay in the physical action resultant of that as the mass/inertia exceeds the speed/power of the muscular response. (ie: if you're arm weighs a lot, or you're holding something like a baseball glove, the reaction would be slower than if you exerted the same muscle effort with less mass.)
 
On a molecular level, the inertia of the ions that travel across the synapses, and the rotational inertia on the membrane macromolecule radicals which propagate the "action potential",
(along with the resistive force of the ions drifting, essentially Pressure x Area)
determine the speed of the signal along the chain of neurons.
 
But those are constant, aren't they? I thought that the question related to changing the mass/inertia and noting the effect.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top