Regarding applicability of Maxwell's equations on microscopic structures.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Maxwell's equations (ME) remain applicable even at microscopic scales, as they do not have a specific length scale limitation. While ME are classical equations and do not incorporate the concept of photons, quantum electrodynamics (QED) is necessary to describe quantum effects, particularly in quantum optics. Notably, QED effects can manifest in macroscopic objects, such as microwave resonators used in cavity-QED experiments. The observation of quantum effects is determined by energy scales and environmental conditions rather than the physical size of the objects involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations in classical electrodynamics
  • Familiarity with quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Knowledge of quantum optics principles
  • Basic concepts of energy scales and temperature effects in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and its applications
  • Explore the role of energy scales in quantum mechanics
  • Research microwave resonators and their use in cavity-QED experiments
  • Investigate the implications of quantum effects in conventional electronic devices like LEDs and HEMTs
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electrodynamics and quantum mechanics who are interested in the transition from classical to quantum theories and their practical applications.

otaKu
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
So from what I seem to understand up until now, Maxwell's equations usually work while assuming that the fields are continuous and smooth instead of the actual complexity at the atomic scale. However, as we move more and more towards the microscopic realm, a point comes when we cannot ignore this miniscule field variations and we need to change our approach. What exactly is that length scale? Is there a specific term for it? What changes do we need to apply to the macroscopic equations to make them work at this regime? I apologise if some of the questions in the thread don't make any sense, I'm rather new to Electrodynamics, especially at the microscopic level and I was wondering about the length scale where things will get troublesome. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no specific length scale for this. The ME always work, even for extremely small objects.
That said, the ME are -sort of- classical equations and there is e.g. no concept of a photon. Hence, to describe quantum effects you need a formalism known as quantum electrodynamics (QED) which is what you would e.g. use in quantum optics.
However, QED effects can -and frequently are- seen in macroscopic objects. A good example would the microwave resonators used in cavity-QED experiments which are many centimeters in size.
What determines whether you see quantum effects in an experiment is not the physical size of the objects, it is rather the energy scales (and temperatures) involved; typically you need very well engineered environments.
 
f95toli said:
There is no specific length scale for this. The ME always work, even for extremely small objects.
That said, the ME are -sort of- classical equations and there is e.g. no concept of a photon. Hence, to describe quantum effects you need a formalism known as quantum electrodynamics (QED) which is what you would e.g. use in quantum optics.
However, QED effects can -and frequently are- seen in macroscopic objects. A good example would the microwave resonators used in cavity-QED experiments which are many centimeters in size.
What determines whether you see quantum effects in an experiment is not the physical size of the objects, it is rather the energy scales (and temperatures) involved; typically you need very well engineered environments.
So is it safe for me to assume that I probably won't have to deal with quantum electrodynamics if I am dealing with conventional electronic devices such as LEDs and HEMTs?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
967
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K