I Regarding Joule's gas expansion experiment

AI Thread Summary
Joule's gas expansion experiment demonstrates that an ideal gas does not change temperature during free expansion, despite expectations of cooling due to work done against pressure. The principle of "viscous heating" explains that the heating effect from viscous dissipation cancels out the cooling effect of expansion, resulting in no net temperature change. In this insulated, rigid system, the total internal energy remains constant, as it is solely a function of temperature for ideal gases. Real gases, however, can experience temperature changes due to intermolecular interactions and changes in specific volume. The discussion clarifies that the overall work in the system is zero, leading to no temperature change in ideal gases.
MichaelWiteman
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi,
Joule's original gas expansion experiment is often presented like in the following link:
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/JouleExperimentOnFreeExpansion/
The apparent lack of temperature change in this experiment is often used in textbooks to demonstrate that the energy of an ideal gas is only temp. dependent. It is, however, often mentioned that a non-negligible change in temp. for real gases occurs because of intermolecular interactions.
My question: wouldn't temp. change (decrease) also for the ideal case? After all the expanding gas will be doing work against the pressure that is being created in the right chamber? Am I missing something?Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Ordinarily you would expect the expanding gas to cool as it expanded. But, in this irreversible expansion, there is another physical mechanism at work. This is often referred to as "viscous heating," although there is minimal actual heat flow. A better term would be "viscous conversion of usable mechanical energy to internal energy. " This is the effect of viscous stresses that develop within the gas, which are determined not by the amount of deformation, but by the rate of deformation. For an ideal gas, the "heating" effect caused by viscous dissipation exactly cancels the cooling effect of the expansion, and the net result is no change in temperature.

In the experiment, there is no work done by the system (the total gas) on its surroundings because the combined chamber is rigid. And there is no heat transfer because the combined chamber is insulated. So, the overall change in internal energy is zero. For an ideal gas, the internal energy is a function only of temperature, so no change in internal energy means no change in temperature. For a real gas, the internal energy is also a function of specific volume, which decreases for the gas. So even though the internal energy is constant, a change in temperature occurs to offset the effect of the change in specific volume.
 
Chestermiller, thank you for your reply! I understand now were my logic broke. I was fixated on the the gas that is expanding in the left chamber and ignored the gas in the right chamber, which is being compressed as the system equilibrates, and thus the overall work in the system is zero. This should had been obvious since the system doesn't change volume. There is a similar experiment (Joule-Thomson) which was used to measure these small temperature changes in the compression/expansion of real gases. Thank you for your patience in explaining these basics!

Sincerely
Mike
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
The question: wouldn't temp. change (decrease) also for the ideal case? After all the expanding gas will be doing work against the pressure that is being created in the right chamber? Am I missing something?

My answer: yes the LHS-gas will do some work on the RHS-gas, but the RHS-gas will receive this work, with w+w=0. Together its only one system with some internal work done that has no effect on the internal energy, and (if n constant) T constant.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top