Undergrad Regarding when to consider both laminar and turbulent flow

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the determination of laminar and turbulent flow over a flat plate, specifically using the Reynolds number as a key factor. The critical transition range for flow is identified as Re = 3x10^5 to Re = 3x10^6, with a calculated Reynolds number of approximately 2.7x10^6 at L = 2m, indicating predominantly turbulent flow. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding local heat transfer coefficients in both laminar and turbulent conditions, highlighting the uncertainty in calculations within the transition region.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Reynolds number and its significance in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with Nusselt number and its application in heat transfer
  • Basic knowledge of laminar and turbulent flow characteristics
  • Experience with fluid properties such as viscosity and density
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation methods for local heat transfer coefficients in laminar and turbulent flow
  • Study the implications of the transition region on heat transfer efficiency
  • Explore advanced fluid dynamics concepts, including boundary layer theory
  • Learn about computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools for simulating flow conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering disciplines, particularly those studying fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and thermal engineering, will benefit from this discussion.

FebinThomas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
For flow over a flat plate when should i assume turbulent flow all over the plate and use the related equations(nusselt number) and when to use the laminar and turbulent equation(Nusslet number)
Hello,i am just a college student who has a little confusion on when to consider both laminar and turbulent flow -say over a flat plate,should i assume turbulent flow all over the plate and use the related equations(nusselt number) or use the laminar and turbulent equation(Nusslet number) but if so there i couldn't find an equation for finding local heat transfer coefficient(hx) for laminar and turbulent condition.

QUESTION
1660197154462.png


Here should i consider laminar&turbelnt conditio or just assume turbulent all over.

I hope i have included the relevant information for understanding my question.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I believe whether or not its turbulent or laminar, or mixed is based on the Reynolds number?
 
What is the value of the Re at L=2m in your example? Compare this with the transition from laminar to turbulent flow which occurs in the range Re=3x10^5 to Re=3x10^6.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
erobz said:
I believe whether or not its turbulent or laminar, or mixed is based on the Reynolds number?
yes,but Re greater than (say for flat plate)5*10^5 is going to be turbulent right if it is mixed when its going to be turbulent.
 
Chestermiller said:
What is the value of the Re at L=2m in your example? Compare this with the transition from laminar to turbulent flow which occurs in the range Re=3x10^5 to Re=3x10^6.
its about 27 *10^5 sir.
at x=2
 
FebinThomas said:
its about 27 *10^5 sir.
at x=2
If th is calculated value is correct, then it sounds like most of the heat transfer is in the transition region. So there is going to be significant uncertainty in the values of the heat transfer coefficients.
 
Wouldn’t 0.25 m/s be too slow for turbulence?
 
At 300 K, the density of liquid propane is 0.493 gm/cc and the viscosity is 0.001 gm/cm-sec. So, under these conditions, I calculate a Re of about 2.5x10^6 at L = 200 cm, in agreement with your calculation. Most of the plate would be judged to be in the transition zone.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FebinThomas and erobz

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K