Reimann sums, okay. How about a Reimann product ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pellman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Sums
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of a "Riemann product," paralleling the idea of Riemann sums and integrals. It proposes a continuous product defined as the limit of a product of functions raised to exponents that approach zero, akin to how Riemann sums transition to integrals. The transformation of this product into a sum via the anti-logarithm leads to an expression involving an integral of the natural logarithm of the function. The conversation suggests that such products may not have been extensively studied independently, as they can typically be reduced to integrals. The inquiry highlights a curiosity about the properties and notation for these products without relying on integrals.
pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Reimann sums, okay. How about a "Reimann product"?

An integral is a sort of "continuous sum". Very roughly, the sum Σk f(xk) Δx goes over to the integral ∫f(x)dx when the number of terms becomes infinite while Δx goes to zero.

What about a similar "continuous product"? If we have the product

Πk [f(xk)] Pk

and let the exponents Pk go to zero while the number of products goes to infinite (and the range of xk is fixed as in an integral) what sort of an animal do we get?

I realize that we can turn this product into a sum by taking the anti-logarithm. Then the continuous limit of this product is e raised to an integral with ln(f) in the integrand. However, I'm curious if the properties of these sorts of entities are known without resorting to integrals. And is there a notation for them?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks, Ambitwistor.

Having thought it over, I see now that these products have probably not been studied in themselves since they can always be reduced to an integral. Like so, ..

Πk [f(xk)] Pk
= exp[ ln ( Πk [f(xk)] Pk ) ]
= exp[ Σk Pkf(xk) ]
= exp[ Σk α(xk)f(xk) Δx ] , Pk = α(xk)Δx
--> exp[ ∫ α(x) f(x) dx ]


which shows why I said the exponents go to zero.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top