Relate wavelength and energy scale

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around relating light intensity measured as a function of wavelength to an energy scale expressed in terms of frequency. The original poster presents the intensity function I(λ) = I₀λ³ and seeks to convert it to the energy scale I(hν).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between intensity, wavelength, and frequency, questioning how to calculate power and intensity over specific ranges. There are discussions about approximations for small intervals and the correct setup for integrals.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various approaches and questioning assumptions. Some have suggested using integrals to find intensity over a range, while others are clarifying the relationships between wavelength and frequency. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to consider small intervals in their calculations and question the appropriateness of using indefinite integrals in this context. There is also a focus on ensuring clarity in the symbols used for different variables to avoid confusion.

senobim
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Light intensity is measured by monochromator and is given by I(\lambda ) = I_{0}\lambda ^{3} How to change it to the energy scale I(h\nu ) = ?

Homework Equations


Photons energy E = h\nu, E =\frac{hc}{\lambda }

The Attempt at a Solution


It's kind of strange to relate energy with wavelength
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much power is there between the frequencies v and v+##\delta##v? What happens if you let ##\delta##v go to zero?
 
Power could be calculated from intensity and area P = I * A.
and It could be related in terms of photon energy P = N * E --> P = N * hv
N - number of photons
 
Last edited:
Yes, but that is not the point. Can you calculate it with the given intensity profile? Approximations for small ##\delta##v are fine.
 
can't think of anything how to do that..

any hints? ;]
 
Last edited:
How much intensity is there between two wavelengths ##\lambda## and ##\lambda + \delta \lambda##? How is that related to my previous question?
 
I = I_{0}(\lambda + (\lambda + \delta \lambda ))^{3}

and \nu = \frac{c}{\lambda }
 
Last edited:
senobim said:
I = I_{0}(\lambda + (\lambda + \delta \lambda ))^{3}
That is not right.
and \nu = \frac{c}{\lambda }
You'll need that formula once you found the intensity in the wavelength range.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: senobim
emm.. Intensity at some wavelength is defind by I(\lambda)=I_{0}\lambda^{3}

at some different lamda I(\lambda_{2})=I_{0}(\lambda_{2})^{3}

where am I going wrong?
 
  • #10
Right, and how is this related to what you wrote in #7?

Can you draw a sketch, ##I(\lambda)##? How would you get the integrated intensity between ##\lambda## and ##\lambda + \delta \lambda##? How can you approximate this for very small intervals of ##\lambda##?
 
  • #11
you mean something like this? I = I_{0}\int \lambda ^{3}d\lambda
 
  • #12
Yes.

There are two approaches: keep the integrals everywhere, or go via the integrands. The former is easier if you know how to do substitutions in integrals, otherwise the latter is easier.
 
  • #13
so my answer is I=I_{0}\int \lambda ^{3}d\lambda =I_{o}\frac{\lambda ^{4}}{4}

and I(h\nu )=I_{o}\frac{h}{4}\left ( \frac{c}{\nu } \right )^4

am I right?
 
  • #14
No, that does not work.

The second "=" in the first line is wrong, and the transition between the first line and the second line does not make sense.

What is ##\lambda## at the very right of the first line? Which wavelength is that?
 
  • #15
i seems that i don't get the concept at all..

I just integrated the expression, what could be wrong by that

P.S. Thanks for your patiece
 
  • #16
senobim said:
I just integrated the expression, what could be wrong by that
Okay, let me ask differently: what did you use as range for the integral, and why?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: senobim
  • #17
I did indefinte integral and that's not the case here, maybe i should try something like this
I = I_{0}\int_{\lambda }^{\lambda +\delta \lambda }\lambda ^{3}d\lambda
 
  • #18
That's what I suggested in post #6.

The integrand should use a different symbol (like ##\lambda'##) to avoid mixing two different things.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: senobim
  • #19
good, so now we have this I = I_{0}\int_{\lambda }^{\lambda +\delta \lambda }\lambda'd\lambda = I_{0}\frac{\lambda'^4}{4}|_{\lambda}^{\lambda + \delta \lambda} = I_{0}(\frac{(\lambda +\delta \lambda)^4 }{4} - \frac{\lambda^4}{4})

and how to relate this with energy?
 
  • #20
You can find an approximation of this for small ##\delta \lambda##. What is the approximate value of an integral if the function is (roughly) constant over the integration range?

This is also the integrated intensity between two specific frequencies, which you can get with the formula relating wavelengths and frequencies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: senobim
  • #21
Could I let \delta\lambda \rightarrow 0?
 
  • #22
Well, if you set it exactly to zero then the integrated intensity is zero, so you want to keep the first order in ##\delta \lambda##.
 
  • #23
still struggling on the approximation, what do you mean by that? Do i need to use trapezoidal rule for the definite integral approximation? Or something else?
 
  • #24
Even easier. Approximate it as rectangle.
 
  • #25
In order to perform approximation how do I find y-cordinate for this function?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 426
Last edited:
  • #26
What do you expect ##I(\lambda)## to be?
 
  • #27
I(λ) = I0λ3
 
  • #28
I=I_{0}\int_{\lambda }^{\lambda +\delta \lambda }\lambda' d\lambda = \lambda +\delta \lambda -\lambda * f(\lambda') = I_{0} \delta \lambda \lambda^3

does that make any sense?
 
  • #29
That is the intensity between ##\lambda## and ##\lambda + \delta \lambda## right (not exactly, but we let ##\delta \lambda## go to zero later so that approximation works).

Now you have to find the frequencies that correspond to ##\lambda## and ##\lambda + \delta \lambda##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: senobim
  • #30
λ=c/ν

I=I_{0}\int_{\nu }^{\nu +\delta \nu }\left ( \frac{c}{\nu } \right )^3d\nu \approx I_{0}\delta \nu \left ( \frac{c}{\nu } \right )^3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K