Related Rates Involving a Cone

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves related rates in the context of an inverted right circular cone, specifically focusing on the rate at which water is being drained from the container as the water level changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the radius and height of the water in the cone, exploring the use of similar triangles to express radius in terms of height. There is uncertainty regarding the derivative of the volume equation and how to handle the variable for radius.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to simplify the problem by eliminating variables. Some have suggested using a direct relationship between radius and height to facilitate calculations. There is acknowledgment of the challenges faced with derivatives and variable dependencies.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem's parameters, including the specific dimensions of the cone and the rate of change of the water level. The discussion reflects a focus on understanding the relationships between the variables involved.

erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Water is being drained from a container which has the shape of an inverted right circular cone. The container has a radius of 5.00 inches at the top and a height of 7.00 inches. At the instant when the water in the container is 4.00 inches deep, the surface level is falling at a rate of 0.7 in/sec. Find the rate at which water is being drained from the container.

Homework Equations



v=1/3 pi r^2 h

The Attempt at a Solution



The values I came up with are as follows.

h=4 (of water level)
r=2.86 (of water level found using equal triangles)
dV/dt= what I am solving for
dh/dt = -0.7

Whenever I take the derivative of the volume equation I end up with a dr/dt that I have no idea what to do with. Am I just doing it wrong and getting the dr/dt when I shouldn't?

I also noticed in a few google results they'd used similar triangles to get r in terms of h. But whenever I do that, I get an actual value for r and the h goes away. Perhaps this is where I am messing up?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So I tried it without the r variable using r=5h/7 instead. That seemed to work because I got an answer that seems more reasonable, 17.955.

Is there any reason to do that? I am guessing because in this case you can only deal with two variables because of that dr/dt you end up with??
 
Yes, you can do that. The water takes the shape of the cone so no matter what the height of the water in the cone, you will always have r= (5/7) h. Draw a picture and think about "similar triangles".
 
So is the main reason why you use r= (5/7)h is to get rid of the r in the equation? Because I have the actual value for h. But if I plug it in, I end up with that dr/dh again that I don't know what to do wtih.
 
Yes, you want to get rid of one variable so that you can write V as a function of a single variable, and then get dV/dh and dh/dt. After you have found those, then you can substitute the known values at the particular time.
 
Sweet. Thank you both. It is much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K