Relating force constant and frequency to mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a body of unknown mass attached to an ideal spring with a known force constant, vibrating at a specific frequency. The task is to relate these quantities to find the mass of the object.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion about how to start the problem and attempts to manipulate the equations of motion. Some participants reference the theory of simple harmonic motion and the relationship between period, mass, and force constant.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the period of oscillation and mass, while others have confirmed the approach taken. There is an exploration of whether alternative methods exist to arrive at the same conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the relevance of calculus in deriving the relationship from the force equation, indicating a potential expectation based on the course level.

Vidatu
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A body of unknown mass is attached to an ideal spring with force constant 123 N/m. It is found to vibrate with a frequency of 5.65 Hz.

Find the mass of the object.

Homework Equations



F=-kx
F=ma
No idea what else...

The Attempt at a Solution



No idea where to start. I get to:

ma=-kx
m = (-123x) / (a)

and can't think where to go from there. I've tried:

1cycle=4 max displacments (x), so
f=5.65Hz = 22.6 cycles of x /s

thereby returning x as .25, but that's dead wrong. Any ideas? I'm totally lost.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass executes simple harmonic motion. In the relevant theory you can find a relation between the period of oscillations, the mass of the object and the force contant.
 
Alright, I got it.

T = 2(pi)*sqrt(m/k)

m = k * (T/(2(pi)))^2 = 9.76E-2

Just for curiosity's sake, was there any other way to do it, that wasn't much harder?
 
That's the only way I know of.
 
Vidatu said:
Alright, I got it.

T = 2(pi)*sqrt(m/k)

m = k * (T/(2(pi)))^2 = 9.76E-2

Just for curiosity's sake, was there any other way to do it, that wasn't much harder?

If you're in a calculus-based course, you might be expected to know *how* to get from the force equation F = ma = -kx to the result for the period. But, in the end, you would still apply the period formula you used here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K