Relating radius and angular freq of an rotating object

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the radius of a rotating object connected to a spring and its angular frequency. The original poster presents a scenario involving a mass attached to a spring and seeks to establish a mathematical relation between the radius and angular frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the mathematical relationship derived from centripetal force and spring force, questioning the implications of an asymptote in the expression for angular frequency. There are inquiries about the physical meaning of this constraint and the effects of exceeding certain angular frequencies.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical expressions and their physical interpretations. Some have offered insights into the limitations of the spring's behavior under high angular frequencies, while others seek clarification on the physical implications of these mathematical constraints.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions related to the spring's behavior under stress and the effects of external torque on the system's dynamics. The constraints of the problem, such as the non-negativity of radius and the limits of Hooke's law, are being examined.

serverxeon
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


xa2s8.png


an ball of mass m is connected by a string with spring constant k, to a rotating shaft.

Find a relation between the radius of the circle, and the angular frequency.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let:
Natural length of spring = x0
Extension of spring = x
Radius of circle = r = x + x0

Centripetal force = Force due to spring
mrω2 = kx = k(r-x0)
Make r the subject,
mrω2 = kr-kx0
kx0=kr-mrω2
kx0=r(k-mω2)
r=\frac{kx_{0}}{k-m\omega^{2}}
--------------
The expression indicates that there is an asymptote when \omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}

Does this means the rotation can never hit this angular velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
serverxeon said:
r=\frac{kx_{0}}{k-m\omega^{2}}
--------------
The expression indicates that there is an asymptote when \omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}

Does this means the rotation can never hit this angular velocity?

Yes. You can also express ω in terms of r:

\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}(1-\frac{x_0}{r})}
ω would be equal to the "natural frequency" at infinite radius.

ehild
 
but expressing ω in terms of radius, i get an asymptote.
what is the physical meaning of this mathematical constraint?
 
If the object performs SHM, the angular frequency is √(k/m) neither higher nor less. Now the object moves along a circle. r is its distance from the origin. It can not be negative. So ω can not exceed √(k/m)


ehild
 
sorry, I don't understand your explanation.
You provided a mathematical description, but I am looking for a physical explanation.

I know that r cannot be negative and hence ω can not exceed √(k/m). I can see that mathematically.

So what happens if I attach a motor to the rotating shaft and drive the shaft at an angular freq higher than √(k/m)?
 
serverxeon said:
So what happens if I attach a motor to the rotating shaft and drive the shaft at an angular freq higher than √(k/m)?

The spring would break or deform. Hooke's law isn't an exact law, its just an experimental approximation for stresses below a certain threshold. You would cross that threshold by pumping omega, since the spring can only stretch out so far. Springs stop being springs (perhaps permanently) when you stretch them beyond their limit.

If you had an infinitely long wire and wound it into an infinitely long spring and could somehow drive it up to that omega with the mass stretching out that far I don't know what would happen since that it isn't really physical.
 
serverxeon said:
sorry, I don't understand your explanation.
You provided a mathematical description, but I am looking for a physical explanation.

I know that r cannot be negative and hence ω can not exceed √(k/m). I can see that mathematically.

So what happens if I attach a motor to the rotating shaft and drive the shaft at an angular freq higher than √(k/m)?

The relation between r and ω holds for the stationary solution. In real life, everything is in rest initially, before switching the motor on.
The motor exerts some torque τ, and the torque accelerates rotation: dω/dt=τ/I. The moment of inertia I=mr2 increases with r as ω increases, and the applied torque becomes less and less effective to increase ω.There is a limit for ω that can not be exceeded by a given torque.

ehild
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
996
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K