Relation between affine connection and covariant derivative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between affine connections and covariant derivatives in the context of general relativity. An affine connection, denoted as ##\nabla##, operates on a vector and a vector field, producing a vector as output. The covariant derivative, represented as ##\nabla_XY##, results from applying this operator to a vector field ##Y## and a vector ##X##. Specifically, on a Lorentzian manifold, the Levi-Civita connection serves as the unique affine connection that is both symmetric and compatible with the metric, ensuring that the metric has a zero covariant derivative, expressed as ##\nabla g \equiv 0##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of affine connections in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with covariant derivatives and their applications
  • Knowledge of Pseudo-Riemannian manifolds
  • Basic concepts of curvature tensors, specifically the Ricci curvature tensor
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita connection in detail
  • Explore the implications of metric compatibility in differential geometry
  • Learn about the Riemann curvature tensor and its significance in general relativity
  • Investigate the Einstein field equations and their relationship with curvature tensors
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, differential geometry, and the mathematical foundations of curvature and connections.

nilsgeiger
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I now study general relativity and have a few questions regarding the mathematical formulation:

1) What ist the relation between an connection and a covariant derivative?
Can you explain the exact difference?

2) One a lorentzian manifold, what ist the relation between the levi-civita-connection and the used covariant derivative?

Unrelated, but probably not important enough to justify a new thread:

3) In the einstein field equitations the ricci curvature tensor is used, the non trivial contraction of the riemann curvature tensor.
My professor told me, you can understand this as averaging along all curves of the parellel transports.
Is there an easy way to see this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nilsgeiger said:
1) What ist the relation between an connection and a covariant derivative?
Can you explain the exact difference?
The affine connection is the operator ##\nabla## that takes a vector and a vector field as input and gives a vector as result. A covariant derivative is the result ##\nabla_XY## of applying that operator to a vector field ##Y## and a vector ##X##.

At least, that's the definition used in my text: John Lee's 'Riemannian Manifolds: an Introduction to Curvature'. I daresay the exact definitions vary between writers.
 
nilsgeiger said:
2) One a lorentzian manifold, what ist the relation between the levi-civita-connection and the used covariant derivative?
If one follows the framework of my previous post, the Levi-Civita connection on a Pseudo-Riemannian manifold is the affine connection that is both symmetric and compatible with the metric. 'Compatible' has a number of different definitions, the simplest of which is that the metric must have zero covariant derivative under that connection, in every direction, everywhere in the manifold (often written as ##\nabla g\equiv 0##).

It is provable that the Levi-Civita connection is unique, ie there is only one affine connection on a Pseudo Riemannian manifold that has those two properties.

The covariant derivative of a vector field on a Pseudo-R manifold with respect to a vector in its tangent bundle will be the result of applying the Levi-Civita connection to that vector field and vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K