Relation between components and path-components of ##X##

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between path components and connected components in topological spaces. It asserts that every path component lies within a connected component, and if the space is locally path-connected, then the two types of components coincide. Participants highlight the need for a clearer argument to show that path components are contained within connected components, emphasizing the importance of specifying the connected component containing given points. Additionally, examples like the topologist's sine curve illustrate the distinction between connected and path-connected spaces. The conversation concludes with a request for further clarification on local path-connectedness and its implications.
Terrell
Messages
316
Reaction score
26

Homework Statement


Theorem: If ##X## is a topological space, each path component of ##X## lies in a component of ##X##. If ##X## is locally path connected, then the components and the path components of ##X## are the same.

I need help locating errors in my proof. Please help.

Homework Equations


Definition (path and path-connected). Given points ##x## and ##y## of the space ##X##, a path in ##X## from ##x## to ##y## is a continuous map ##f:[a,b]\to X## of some closed interval in the real line into ##X##, such that ##f(a)=x## and ##f(b)=y##. A space ##X## is said to be path connected if every pair of points of ##X## can be joined by a path ##X##.

Definition (components).
Given ##X##, define an equivalence relation on ##X## by setting ##x \sim y## if there is a connected subspace of ##X## containing both ##x## and ##y##. The equivalence classes are the components (or the "connected components") of ##X##.

Definition(locally connected). A space ##X## is said to be locally connected at ##x## if for every neighborhood ##U## of ##x##, there is a connected neighborhood ##V## of ##x## contained in ##Y##. If ##X## is locally connected at each of its points, it is said simply to be locally connected.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let ##X## be a topological space and ##P## be a path component of ##X##. Note ##\forall x_1,x_2 \in P##, there exist a continuous function ##f:[a,b]\subset\Bbb{R}\to X## such that ##f(a)=x_1## and ##f(b)=x_2##. Since ##[a,b]## is connected, then ##f([a,b])## is also a connected subspace of ##X## and ##x_1,x_2 \in f([a,b])##. Thus, ##P\subseteq f([a,b])##. Since connnected subspaces lie entirely within a component, let ##f([a,b])\subset C## where ##C## is some component of ##X##. Hence, ##P\subset C##.

Moreover, what if we also assume that ##X## is locally path-connected. So far we have ##x_1,x_2 \in P## and ##f(a)=x_1, f(b)=x_2 \in f([a,b])##. Let ##x'\in f([a,b])##. We want to show ##f([a,b])\subset P##. Then, by local path-connectedness of ##X##, for every open set ##O'## in ##X## such that ##x' \in O'## imply there exists a path-connected neighborhood ##\mathscr{P'}## such that ##x'\in \mathscr{P'}\subset O'##. Since ##x'\in f([a,b])##, then ##\exists c\in [a,b]\subset\Bbb{R}(f(c)=x')##. Since ##f## is continuous, then ##g=f|_{[a,c]}## and ##h=f|_{[c,b]}## are continuous and by definition of a path, ##g(a)=x_1##, ##g(c)=x'##, ##h(c)=x'##, and ##h(b)=x_2## imply there exist paths between ##x_1## and ##x'## and also ##x'## and ##x_2##; denoted, ##x_1\sim x'## and ##x'\sim x_2## where ##\sim## relates two point linked by a path. Since ##\forall\alpha\in\mathscr{P'}(\alpha\sim x')##, then, by transitivity of ##\sim##, ##\alpha\sim x_1## and ##\alpha\sim x_2##. By the symmetry of ##\sim##, ##\mathscr{P'}\subset P##, ##P\subset\mathscr{P'}##, ##f([a,b])\subset\mathscr{P'}##, and ##\mathscr{P'}\subset f([a,b])##. Therefore, ##f([a,b])=P##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Terrell said:

Homework Statement


Theorem: If ##X## is a topological space, each path component of ##X## lies in a component of ##X##. If ##X## is locally path connected, then the components and the path components of ##X## are the same.

I need help locating errors in my proof. Please help.

Homework Equations


Definition (path and path-connected). Given points ##x## and ##y## of the space ##X##, a path in ##X## from ##x## to ##y## is a continuous map ##f:[a,b]\to X## of some closed interval in the real line into ##X##, such that ##f(a)=x## and ##f(b)=y##. A space ##X## is said to be path connected if every pair of points of ##X## can be joined by a path ##X##.

Definition (components).
Given ##X##, define an equivalence relation on ##X## by setting ##x \sim y## if there is a connected subspace of ##X## containing both ##x## and ##y##. The equivalence classes are the components (or the "connected components") of ##X##.

Definition(locally connected). A space ##X## is said to be locally connected at ##x## if for every neighborhood ##U## of ##x##, there is a connected neighborhood ##V## of ##x## contained in ##Y##. If ##X## is locally connected at each of its points, it is said simply to be locally connected.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let ##X## be a topological space and ##P## be a path component of ##X##. Note ##\forall x_1,x_2 \in P##, there exist a continuous function ##f:[a,b]\subset\Bbb{R}\to X## such that ##f(a)=x_1## and ##f(b)=x_2##. Since ##[a,b]## is connected, then ##f([a,b])## is also a connected subspace of ##X## and ##x_1,x_2 \in f([a,b])##. Thus, ##P\subseteq f([a,b])##. Since connnected subspaces lie entirely within a component, let ##f([a,b])\subset C## where ##C## is some component of ##X##. Hence, ##P\subset C##.

Moreover, what if we also assume that ##X## is locally path-connected. So far we have ##x_1,x_2 \in P## and ##f(a)=x_1, f(b)=x_2 \in f([a,b])##. Let ##x'\in f([a,b])##. We want to show ##f([a,b])\subset P##. Then, by local path-connectedness of ##X##, for every open set ##O'## in ##X## such that ##x' \in O'## imply there exists a path-connected neighborhood ##\mathscr{P'}## such that ##x'\in \mathscr{P'}\subset O'##. Since ##x'\in f([a,b])##, then ##\exists c\in [a,b]\subset\Bbb{R}(f(c)=x')##. Since ##f## is continuous, then ##g=f|_{[a,c]}## and ##h=f|_{[c,b]}## are continuous and by definition of a path, ##g(a)=x_1##, ##g(c)=x'##, ##h(c)=x'##, and ##h(b)=x_2## imply there exist paths between ##x_1## and ##x'## and also ##x'## and ##x_2##; denoted, ##x_1\sim x'## and ##x'\sim x_2## where ##\sim## relates two point linked by a path. Since ##\forall\alpha\in\mathscr{P'}(\alpha\sim x')##, then, by transitivity of ##\sim##, ##\alpha\sim x_1## and ##\alpha\sim x_2##. By the symmetry of ##\sim##, ##\mathscr{P'}\subset P##, ##P\subset\mathscr{P'}##, ##f([a,b])\subset\mathscr{P'}##, and ##\mathscr{P'}\subset f([a,b])##. Therefore, ##f([a,b])=P##.

Can you define also local-path-connectedness, please? EDIT: Maybe too, you can use the fact that ##\mathbb R^n ## satisfies , is an example of this, i.e., the path-components agree with the connected components. You seem to be assuming path-connected implies connected ## P \subset f([a,b]) ## which is true but it would be nice to have an argument for it. And maybe you can specify whether C is a path-component or a connected component. And it is not just "some" component, it is the component containing ##x_1, x_2##, I think this is essential here. It seems too, that you could make a proof by showing both ## P \subset C ## and ## C \subset P ## using local-path connectedness, so that you showed path-components of locally-path connected spaces agree with connected components of those spaces.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Terrell
WWGD said:
You seem to be assuming path-connected implies connected P⊂f([a,b])P⊂f([a,b]) P \subset f([a,b]) which is true but it would be nice to have an argument for it.
I meant ##C## is a connected component of ##X##. I assumed that if the path ##f## in ##P## is inside the connected subspace ##f([a,b]) \subset C##, then ##P \subset C##; which I think now is insufficient. Is this what you were trying to point out that is deficient? Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Terrell said:
I meant ##C## is a connected component of ##X##. I assumed that if the path ##f## in ##P## is inside the connected subspace ##f([a,b]) \subset C##, then ##P \subset C##; which I think now is insufficient. Is this what you were trying to point out that is deficient? Thanks!
Yes, partly. A disconnection would not allow the path to remain within the space; would be "broken" up by the disconnection. So, yes, the path component of an element is contain within its connected component. EDIT: I was trying to throw in some ideas. I guess you know of the standard example of the topologist's sine curve Sin(1/x) as an example of a connected but not path-connected space?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Terrell
WWGD said:
Yes, partly. A disconnection would not allow the path to remain within the space; would be "broken" up by the disconnection. So, yes, the path component of an element is contain within its connected component. EDIT: I was trying to throw in some ideas. I guess you know of the standard example of the topologist's sine curve Sin(1/x) as an example of a connected but not path-connected space?
I haven't studied examples, yet. Thanks as you were helpful for pointing this out!
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
986
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K