Relation between E and Potential gradient.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between electric field (E) and electric potential (V), specifically the equation E = -dv/dx. It establishes that as the distance from a positive charge increases, the electric field strength decreases, leading to a decrease in potential drop, which may seem contradictory. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the signs of charges when determining potential differences between two points, a and b, along the x-axis. It concludes that potentials are linear and can be manipulated like other linear functions, reinforcing that potential increases as one approaches a positive charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field concepts
  • Familiarity with electric potential and its mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of charge interactions and their effects on potential
  • Basic grasp of calculus, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of electric potential from electric field equations
  • Explore the concept of electric potential energy and its dependence on charge magnitude and sign
  • Learn about field lines and their representation in electrostatics
  • Investigate the implications of potential differences in circuit theory
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields and potentials.

harjyot
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
According to the theory,
E= -dv/dx
or E.dx = -dv
So if both are positive, the potential drop should increase.
But as we know, if a positive charge is placed, as the distance from it keeps on increasing, field strength starts decreasing and potential drop should increase But this is contradictory right?

Similarly if we make a diagram of field lines along the x-axis and place a sample charge at (a,0,0) and move it to (b,0,0) such that b>a, how can we predict which is at greater potential : a or b? The field value isn't given
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must take the sign of the charge into account.
 
UltrafastPED said:
You must take the sign of the charge into account.

Well, yes but Electric Potential is defined in terms of a unit positive charge. The Potential Energy of a charge will depend upon its magnitude and sign.
In situations like this, the thing to do is to follow the signs rigorously and not to trust to intuition. The system is quite consistent.
 
Isn't that what I said?
 
I didn't say I disagreed. I was just amplifying and emphasising.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
harjyot said:
So if both are positive, the potential drop should increase.
But as we know, if a positive charge is placed, as the distance from it keeps on increasing, field strength starts decreasing
Yes, this is correct.

harjyot said:
and potential drop should increase
As the field strength decreases the potential drop also decreases. I am not sure why you think otherwise.


harjyot said:
Similarly if we make a diagram of field lines along the x-axis and place a sample charge at (a,0,0) and move it to (b,0,0) such that b>a, how can we predict which is at greater potential : a or b? The field value isn't given
You don't need to calculate fields to determine the potential. Potentials are linear, so you can simply add them up or shift them around like any other linear function.
 
Think of potential as the energy required to bring a charge from infinitely far away to the point in question. The closer you get to the point in question (say a positive charge), the higher your potential. Now think of the potential as a hilltop. At infinity it is flat, but as you get closer to your charge, the hill gets steeper. This "steepness" is the field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
483
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K