Does Compressing a Spring Decrease Its Potential Energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between compressing a spring and its potential energy, particularly in the context of conservative forces and work done on a system. Participants explore the implications of the equation for potential energy in relation to a spring-mass system and the forces involved during compression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that compressing a spring involves a force from the spring acting in the opposite direction to the displacement of their thumb, leading to confusion about potential energy changes.
  • Another participant suggests that work is being done on the spring-mass system, which increases its potential energy, comparing it to pushing a ball up a hill.
  • There is a discussion about whether the equation for potential energy applies to the thumb's force, with some suggesting that the thumb's force is not conservative, complicating the analysis.
  • Clarification is sought regarding whether the potential energy of a particle affected by the spring is equivalent to the potential energy stored in the spring itself.
  • One participant asserts that all potential energy is stored in the spring's mechanism, independent of any mass attached to it, raising questions about the fate of potential energy when no mass is present.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of potential energy in the context of the spring and the forces involved. There is no consensus on how to reconcile the potential energy changes for the thumb and the spring, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of applying the equation for potential energy to a system involving non-conservative forces and the implications of treating the spring and mass as separate entities. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of the forces and the definitions of potential energy in this context.

Elias Waranoi
Messages
45
Reaction score
2
I have just read chapter 7.4 FORCE AND POTENTIAL ENERGY in Sears and Zemansky's university physics 14th edition. There they show that a conservative force always acts to push the system toward lower potential energy in a one-dimensional motion with the equation Fx(x) = - dU(x)/dx. As I understand this it is saying that when a force is pushing in the same direction as its displacement then the potential energy is lowered. I felt like it made sense but after thinking of different scenarios I stumbled upon something that I couldn't understand.

If positive x is to the right and I have a metal spring with it's right side attached to a wall. If I compress the spring with my thumb, my thumb experiences a force to the left from the metal spring while it is moving/pushing to the right. Since the force is in the other direction than the displacement Fx(x) = - dU(x)/dx gives an increase in potential energy.

But what happens if we look at the spring? The spring is feeling the force from my thumb, a force to the right while it being compressed/displaced to the right. The force and displacement on the spring is in the same direction so according to my understanding of Fx(x) = - dU(x)/dx the potential energy should decrease? That doesn't make sense.

According to all this my thumbs potential energy increases but the metal spring's decreases, what have I understood wrong? Writing this I'm thinking that it might be that my thumb is not a conservative force in the system but I'm not sure.

(Was going to post this in the homework board but then I'd have to use the homework template and this doesn't feel like a homework template question, I'm guessing this is the right place to post?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elias Waranoi said:
Since the force is in the other direction than the displacement Fx(x) = - dU(x)/dx gives an increase in potential energy.
Yes, the potential energy of the spring-mass system ! Work is being done ON the system.

It's like pushing a ball up the hill: you perform work to do that and your work can be converted to kinetic energy of the ball when you let it roll down again.
 
Elias Waranoi said:
According to all this my thumbs potential energy increases but the metal spring's decreases, what have I understood wrong? Writing this I'm thinking that it might be that my thumb is not a conservative force in the system but I'm not sure.

The equation you are using here is for the energy of a particle under a conservative force. The more the spring is compressed, the greater the potential energy of the particle.

The potential energy in the spring is the potential energy of the particle.

If you try to turn the system round and treat the spring as a particle under the force of your thumb, you will get a mess.
 
PeroK said:
The equation you are using here is for the energy of a particle under a conservative force.
So the equation is describing the change in potential energy for a mass that is affected by a conservative force? And since me pressing my thumb on a spring is not a conservative force I just get trash when trying to turn the system around, is this correct?

PeroK said:
The potential energy in the spring is the potential energy of the particle.
Just to clarify, are you saying that if a particle affected by the force from a spring has 100 joules in potential energy, the spring also has 100 joules in potential energy?
 
Elias Waranoi said:
So the equation is describing the change in potential energy for a mass that is affected by a conservative force? And since me pressing my thumb on a spring is not a conservative force I just get trash when trying to turn the system around, is this correct?Just to clarify, are you saying that if a particle affected by the force from a spring has 100 joules in potential energy, the spring also has 100 joules in potential energy?

Yes, all the PE is stored in the spring's mechanism, independent of the mass. If you hold the spring and remove the mass, then the mass loses all its PE!

You might then ask where all the PE goes if there is no mass? That's where the assumption about a massless spring is exposed. It must go to KE of the spring.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Elias Waranoi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K