Undergrad Relation between 'P' and 'V' for an Adiabatic process

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the relationship PV^γ = constant for adiabatic processes, highlighting the substitution of internal energy from an isochoric process into the adiabatic equation. It explains that while the work done in an isochoric process is zero, the heat absorbed leads to changes in internal energy, which can be related to work done in an adiabatic process. The significance of the heat capacity ratio γ is also addressed, noting its relation to the degrees of freedom of gas molecules and its importance in cyclic processes for converting heat into work, particularly in engines. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the behavior of gases under different thermodynamic conditions.
Dr. Who
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I have a little query concerning the derivation of PV γ = constant. In my textbook of Physics, first they give the equation for adiabatic process using the first law of Thermodynamics, as;

dEint = W → (1)​

where,
ΔEint ⇒ change in internal energy and W ⇒ workdone
Then, they used the relation:

Cv = Q / ndt​
Where,
Q ⇒ heat
'n' ⇒ no. of moles
Cv ⇒ Molar Heat capacity at constant volume
dT ⇒ Change in temperature

Now, for an isochoric process;
Q = dEint
dEint = nCvdT → (2)​

Substituting dEint from eq.(2) into eq.(1)

⇒ W = nCvdT​

As thermodynamic work is given as W = -PdV
∴ -PdV = nCvdT
⇒ PdV = - nCvdT → (3)​

Now, writing equation of state of the gas in differential form as;
d(PV) = d(nRT)​
⇒ PdV + VdP = nRdT​
Using eq.(3)
⇒ - nCvdT + VdP = nRdT
⇒ VdP = nCvdT + nRdT​

Using the relation Cp = Cv + R into the above equation

⇒ VdP = nCpdT → (4)​

Now, dividing eq.(4) by eq.(3)
⇒ VdP / PdV = -Cp / Cv
or VdP / PdV = -γ
where, γ ⇒ ratio of molar heat capacities

Rearranging the above equation:
dP / P = -γ dV / V​
Integrating both sides with the initial state 'i' and final state 'f' being the lower and upper limits respectively, gives;

dP / P = -γ dV / V​

⇒ PiViγ = PfVfγ

which can be written as: PV γ = constant

Now, my query was that,
1. why have they substituted the internal energy from an isochoric process into an adiabatic process (Substituting dEint from eq.(2) into eq.(1))? Considering this substitution, can we say that heat absorbed in the isochoric process is equivalent to the work done in an adiabatic process?

2. What is the physical significance of γ on a curve of PV γ = constant ? (Please do not go into the details of poltropic processes)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr. Who said:
1. why have they substituted the internal energy from an isochoric process into an adiabatic process (Substituting dEint from eq.(2) into eq.(1))? Considering this substitution, can we say that heat absorbed in the isochoric process is equivalent to the work done in an adiabatic process?

2. What is the physical significance of γ on a curve of PV γ = constant ? (Please do not go into the details of poltropic processes)
For an isochoric process the work done is always zero.
A typical example of an isochoric process is addition or removal of heat from a closed system.
The volume remains constant but temperature and pressure change according to the process.
thus leading to change in internal energy.

An adiabatic system is perfectly insulated from external environment and there is no heat transfer in or out of the system.
Work done in an adiabatic process completely results in change in the internal energy of the system.
so the two processes can be related.The heat capacity ratio(gamma) for an ideal gas can be related to the degrees of freedom of a molecule of gas

gamma = 1 + 2/(degree of freedom )
for a monoatomic gas, degree of freedom is 3 so its value is (1 +2/3) = 1.67
and for diatomic gas it (gamma) goes to 1.4 as the gas has five degrees of freedom.
This ratio becomes important when one uses the gas in a cyclic process for conversion of heat into work. and gas is taken as working substance like in a heat ( carnot engine.) engine.
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Who
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K