Relative momentum formula or not?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions under which the approximate formula for momentum can be used instead of the full relativistic formula. It concludes that a car and a neutron traveling at 3600 m/s can use the approximate formula, while a proton at 2×108 m/s and an electron at 6×106 m/s require the relativistic formula. The relativistic effects become negligible for velocities significantly lower than the speed of light, specifically when the velocity is less than approximately 0.1c.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with momentum equations
  • Knowledge of the speed of light (c) and its significance
  • Basic calculus for evaluating relativistic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz transformation and its implications on momentum
  • Learn how to calculate relativistic momentum using the formula p = mv/√(1 - v²/c²)
  • Explore the differences between classical and relativistic mechanics
  • Investigate scenarios where relativistic effects become significant in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in fields involving high-speed particle dynamics, particularly those studying relativistic mechanics and momentum calculations.

leejqs
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In which of these situations is it reasonable to use the approximate formula for the momentum of an object, instead of the full relativistically correct formula?
A car traveling on the interstate.
A proton in outer space traveling at 2×108 m/s.
A commercial jet plane flying between New York and Seattle.
An electron in a vacuum tube traveling 6×106 m/s.
A neutron traveling at 3600 meters per second.


Homework Equations


Velocities closer to the speed of light require a relativistic formula for momentum.

The Attempt at a Solution

A car traveling on the interstate.
A proton in outer space traveling at 2×108 m/s. (Relativistic)
A commercial jet plane flying between New York and Seattle. (Approximate)
An electron in a vacuum tube traveling 6×106 m/s. (Relativistic)
A neutron traveling at 3600 meters per second. (Approximate)

I am incorrect in these answers... however, what makes a velocity "close" to the speed of light. Would a neutron traveling 3600 m/s require a relativistic formula? 3600 m/s isn't very close to 3E8 m/s.

Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron in vacuum tube traveling at 6 x 10^6 m/s is traveling at .02c. So the relativistic calculation differs from the approximate by a factor of 1.0002. There is no need to use the relativistic calculation.

To determine whether the relativistic calculation is needed you have to evaluate:

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}[/tex]

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K