I understand the concepts behind SR and Lorentz transformations and was explaining the basics to my son by illustrating the classic laser-beam-in-a-train-car explanation. But then I started thinking... If I was in a boxcar w/ a clear wall and was throwing a ball straight up, measuring the time from toss to catch, and then computing the average speed... and an observer was standing outside and performed the same measurement s/he would see the ball take a much longer route than I would (assuming the train was moving at, say, 100 kph). That means we would have a(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); significantdisagreement about the average speed we compute for the ball.

Am I correct on this? It seems bizarre that two observers would see such different path lengths at everyday (non-relativistic) speeds. ?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Relative motion - disagreement at very low speeds

Loading...

Similar Threads for Relative motion disagreement |
---|

B Relative motion and proper time |

Insights Rindler Motion in Special Relativity, Part 2: Rindler Coordinates - Comments |

Insights Rindler Motion in Special Relativity: Hyperbolic Trajectories - Comments |

B Synchronize clocks in relative motion? |

I How is SR applied to circular motion? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**