Relative Velocity problem - stuck, lacking ideas.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a relative velocity problem from Halliday/Resnick/Walker, 7th Edition, specifically Exercise 57. A man runs on a conveyor belt, taking 2.5 seconds to reach one end and 10 seconds to return, prompting the need to find the ratio of the man's speed (v) to the conveyor belt's speed (u). The solution involves setting up equations based on the distances covered in both scenarios, leading to the conclusion that the relationship can be expressed as v = (12.5/7.5)u or u = (7.5/12.5)v.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relative motion concepts
  • Familiarity with basic kinematics equations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Knowledge of vector direction and speed analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of relative velocity in one dimension
  • Learn to set up and solve kinematic equations for moving objects
  • Explore real-world applications of relative motion problems
  • Practice additional exercises from Halliday/Resnick/Walker, 7th Edition
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those tackling mechanics and relative motion problems, as well as educators looking for example problems to illustrate these concepts.

Siracuse
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Halliday/Resnick/Walker, 1 - Mechanics, 7th Edition.
Chap. 4, Exercise 57 - Relative Movement in One Dimension

(I'm sorry if translation sounds confusing at first, the book is in Portuguese)

A suspicious man runs as fast as he can on a conveyor belt, taking aprox. 2.5 seconds to reach the other side. Then, a guard(lit. "security agent") shows up and the man tries to run back as fast as he can to the start point, taking 10 seconds. What is the (lit.) "reason" between the man's speed and the conveyor belt's speed?

Homework Equations



The "reason" (don't know the right word) that the problem is asking for is basically:

(X_m)/(X_b), where v_m is the man's speed and v_b is the conveyor belt's speed.

Revelant equation for R. M. in one Dimension:

X_pa = X_pb + X_ba; for velocity and acceleration, just a matter of taking the derivatives.

The Attempt at a Solution



All I could do was a superficial analysis of the problem: if it took less time to walk from x_0(start point) to x_f(end point) while on the conveyor belt when compared to the second displacement, obviously the vectors v_m and v_b are in the same direction (positive in respect to the x-axis) in the first displacement.

I have 2 known referentials: the man and the conveyor belt. A third one, the "stationary" referential, would be the floor (f). So, renaming the variables the eq. for R. M.,

X_mf = X_mb + X_bf

From here...no idea what to do. How exactly do I relate the man's velocity on the conveyor belt and the man's velocity while running by foot?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are over complicating it. Reason = relation / ratio.

The man runs a distance x in 2.5 seconds with the belt and 10secs against it.
so he is doing x/2.5 m/s in one case and x/10 m/s in the other.
We assume his legs are running at the same speed in both cases.
We also know he must be running faster than belt or he would never get back ( this let's us check we have the signs correct!)
Let v=speed of man u=speed of belt

First case u+v = x/2.5 second case u-v=x/10
X is the same, so x = 2.5(u + v) = 10(u-v)
2.5v+10v = 10u-2.5u so 12.5u = 7.5v then u = 7.5/12.5 v or v = 12.5/7.5 u
 
Last edited:
mgb_phys said:
I think you are over complicating it. Reason = relation / ratio.

I do that very often.

The man runs a distance x in 2.5 seconds with the belt and 10secs against it.
so he is doing x/2.5 m/s in one case and x/10 m/s in the other.
We assume his legs are running at the same speed in both cases.
We also know he must be running faster than belt or he would never get back ( this let's us check we have the signs correct!)
Let v=speed of man u=speed of belt

First case u+v = x/2.5 second case u-v=x/10
X is the same, so x = 2.5(u + v) = 10(u-v)
2.5v+10v = 10u-2.5u so 12.5u = 7.5v then u = 7.5/12.5 v or v = 12.5/7.5 u

Sounds logically correct and more precise than my thinking. The answer's correct.

Nevermind that, got the concept...well, thanks nonetheless. :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K