I have studied(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

N.David Mermin "Relativistic addition of velocities directly from the constancy of the velocity of light," Am.J.Phys. 51 1130 1983 and others with the same subject quoted by the Author. He describes a derivation of the addition law that dispenses not only with the LT but also makes no us of length contraction, time dilation or the relativity of silmultaneity.

He starts directly using the concept ofspeedwithout mentioning how do we measure it absolute length/absolute time interval; proper length/coordinate time interval or proper length/poper time interval. Does that diminish the value of the derivation?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Relativistic addition of velocities without lorentz transformations

Loading...

Similar Threads - Relativistic addition velocities | Date |
---|---|

Relativistic velocity addition | Sep 14, 2015 |

Relativistic velocity addition | Aug 13, 2014 |

Relativistic velocity addition and signs | Apr 27, 2014 |

Observed speed of light [actually about relativistic velocity addition] | Apr 23, 2010 |

Relativistic addition question | Aug 26, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**