Relativistic Boat: Does It Float or Sink?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter genesic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Relativistic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a boat traveling at relativistic speeds and its buoyancy in water. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on buoyancy from different frames of reference, considering both theoretical and conceptual aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that from the boat's frame, the water is contracted and thus more dense, which would increase buoyancy and keep the boat afloat.
  • Others argue that from the water's frame, the boat is contracted, leading to less water being displaced and a smaller buoyant force, suggesting the boat would sink.
  • A participant mentions that when gravity is considered, the 'relativistic boat' tends to sink, referencing a standard solution in the literature.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that radial acceleration caused by Earth is larger than 1g when the boat moves relativistically in a transverse direction, affecting the boat's behavior in water.
  • One participant questions the validity of converting polar coordinate analysis to a pseudo-Cartesian system for a 'flat planet' scenario, proposing a method to analyze the problem using different coordinates.
  • Another participant refers to the "submarine paradox" and connects it to the current discussion, suggesting that similar principles apply to the relativistic boat scenario.
  • Participants discuss an approximate weak field equation for the force acting on a particle moving horizontally in a gravitational field, which could be used to analyze buoyancy forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effects of relativistic speeds on buoyancy, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their analyses, such as dependence on specific assumptions about the frame of reference and the nature of the gravitational field. The discussion also highlights the complexity of applying relativistic principles to buoyancy in a gravitational context.

genesic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is a thought experiment that my friends and I (physics graduate students all) were pondering while we should have been doing Jackson homework. Consider a boat traveling at relativistic speeds. From the boat's frame, the water is contracted, and therefore is more dense. This would increase the buoyancy of the water and keep the boat afloat. However, from the water's frame, the boat is contracted, making it smaller and denser. Since a smaller amount of water is displaced, there is a smaller buoyant force, and so the boat sinks. So what actually happens?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
genesic said:
From the boat's frame, the water is contracted, and therefore is more dense. This would increase the buoyancy of the water and keep the boat afloat.

The standard solution is that when gravity is also considered, the 'relativistic boat' tends to sink, e.g.: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0305106" .

IMO, another (easy) way to look at it is that the radial acceleration caused by Earth is larger than 1g when the boat is moving relativistically in a transverse direction, i.e., when it has an angular velocity relative to Earth's center of mass.

[tex] \frac{d^2 r}{d t^2} = \frac {3 m{{\it v_r}}^{2}}{ \left( r-2\,m \right) r} + \left( r-2\,m \right) \left( {{\it v_\phi}}^{2}-{\frac {m}{{r}^{3}}} \right) [/tex]

as https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1046874&postcount=17", where [itex]v_{\phi} =d\phi/dt[/itex] (geometric units). It is clear that any non-zero [itex]v_{\phi}[/itex] causes an increase in [itex]{d^2 r}/{d t^2}[/itex].

[Edit: I erred when working out the limit when speed approaches c, so I took it out for now...]

[Edit2: I also realized that this can only work for a 'flat planet' scenario. For a normal, almost spherical planet, any relativistic speed will let the boat fly out of the water and possibly even reach escape velocity...]:wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jorrie said:
[Edit2: I also realized that this can only work for a 'flat planet' scenario. For a normal, almost spherical planet, any relativistic speed will let the boat fly out of the water and possibly even reach escape velocity...]

I would like to know if the following is a valid approach to the problem. In order to convert pervect's polar coordinate analysis:

[tex] <br /> \frac{d^2 r}{d t^2} = \frac {3 m{{\it v_r}}^{2}}{ \left( r-2\,m \right) r} + \left( r-2\,m \right) \left( {{\it v_\phi}}^{2}-{\frac {m}{{r}^{3}}} \right) <br /> [/tex]

to a pseudo-Cartesian system for a 'flat planet' analysis, we can subtract the centrifugal acceleration [itex]r v^2_{\phi}[/itex] and also get rid of the angular velocity by replacing it with a horizontal (x) velocity: [itex]v_x = r v_{\phi}[/itex].

If we take the initial radial velocity [itex]v_r = v_y = 0[/itex], we get the initial vertical (Cartesian) acceleration of a free-falling submarine, moving at [itex]v_x[/itex] (with c=G=1):

[tex] <br /> \frac{d^2 y}{d t^2} = \left( r-2\,m \right) \left( \frac{{ v_x}^{2}}{r^2}-{\frac {m}{{r}^{3}}} \right) -\frac{{ v_x}^{2}}{r} = -\frac{m}{r^2}\left(1-\frac{2m}{r} + 2v_x^2\right)<br /> [/tex]

In a weak field (1g), but high speed Earth surface scenario, the vertical gravitational acceleration simply becomes: [itex]a \approx (1 + 2v_x^2) [/tex] g, with g ~ -9.8 m/s[itex]^2[/itex].[/itex]
 
Last edited:
This is basically the same as the "submarine paradox" that was investigated by George Matsas. See http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0305106

<edit> Oops, I just noticed that Jorrie has already posted that link.. sorry

P.S.

In an old thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=225573&highlight=submarine&page=5 I worked out this approximate weak field equation for the force acting on a particle moving horizontally in a gravitational field :


[tex]F' = \frac{GMm}{R^2} \frac{(1-Vv/c^2)^2}{(1-V^2/c^2)\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex]

where:
V = horizontal velocity of the massive body (M) wrt the observer,
v = horizontal velocity of the test particle (m) wrt the observer,
M >> m.

This equation can be used to work out the buoyancy forces of the water or the force acting on the submarine, from the point of view of an observer at rest with the water or co-moving with the submarine.
 
Last edited:
kev said:
... I worked out this approximate weak field equation for the force acting on a particle moving horizontally in a gravitational field :

[tex]F' = \frac{GMm}{R^2} \frac{(1-Vv/c^2)^2}{(1-V^2/c^2)\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex]

I agree - both approximations 'resolve' the submarine paradox by increasing the gravitational force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K