Relativistic effects on radiation sources

In summary: This will make the measurement easier (and more precise).In summary, the experts discuss the effects of relativistic speeds on half-life measurements and gamma emissions from radioisotopes. They also mention the use of accelerators to shift gamma energies and the potential impact of thermal motions on spectroscopic measurements. However, for most practical purposes, these effects can be disregarded.
  • #1
solo-mfg
2
0
I have limited physics knowledge, but I have always been interested in the physics and I am an industrial radiation safety officer with an engineering background.Have there been any experiments in respect to measuring half life with large variance in gravitational fields? Although half life may be constant for a particular radioisotope, can I also assume this is only relative to a radioactive particle at rest?

If a radioisotope was traveling away from me at 99.9% of the speed of light, would it not appear by measurement of alpha particles hitting a detector appear to have a different half life ?

Where i also get confused is in respect to the relative gamma field.

if the radioisotope was moving away, can I assume the gamma emission would remain the same, but that there would be a shift in the wavelength ?

That is to say the gamma emission may end up being observed as visible light if the speed of the radioisotope was moving away fast enough?

If this were true in respect to wavelength shift, how fast would a radioisotope like Cs137 need to be moving in order for its gamma emission to shift far enough down that it no longer poses a threat (no longer ionizing radiation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
solo-mfg said:
Although half life may be constant for a particular radioisotope, can I also assume this is only relative to a radioactive particle at rest?
Yes. The reported half-life (and atomic mass, and just about all the other properties) are those that would be measured by an observer at rest relative to the material. From this, we can use the methods of relativity to calculate what an observer moving relative to the material would measure.

If a radioisotope was traveling away from me at 99.9% of the speed of light, would it not appear by measurement of alpha particles hitting a detector appear to have a different half life ?
Yes, and this effect is observed (with subatomic particles, not necessarily nuclei) every day in particle accelerators. Also, google for "cosmic ray muon time dilation" for another example.

if the radioisotope was moving away, can I assume the gamma emission would remain the same, but that there would be a shift in the wavelength ?

That is to say the gamma emission may end up being observed as visible light if the speed of the radioisotope was moving away fast enough?

If this were true in respect to wavelength shift, how fast would a radioisotope like Cs137 need to be moving in order for its gamma emission to shift far enough down that it no longer poses a threat (no longer ionizing radiation)?

Yes, the Doppler effect will red-shift the gamma radiation from a source moving away from you. Google for "relativistic Doppler" to find the formula that you would use to calculate the speed needed to shift gamma radiation down into the visible spectrum. (It works the other way too - approaching a source of visible light at hyper-relativistic velocities would create gamma exposure).
 
  • #3
Thanks, I figured I had it right, but thought I might as well ask a few experts.

Would I also be correct to say that you could shift the energy of a gamma emission by accelerating the radioisotope?

example Cs-137 particle in a linear accelerator.

If the emission is 661 KeV and your accelerator is 200KeV, would you observe an 861KeV gamma emission in one direction and a 461KeV gamma in the exact opposite?If I am using a detector to analyze and identify an unknown radioisotope, are there shifts in KeV due to movements of the atoms relative to the detector?

that is to say I am wondering if the temperature of the radioisotope makes a difference when measuring the KeV spikes?

I assume statistically it would work out to be what is published when observed over time, but can I assume that an instantaneous measurement would have some variance in the observed KeV levels due to movement of the atoms within the sample?

Detectors interact differently in respect to measurement speed, so I am curious about the effects.

I am unfamiliar with the calculation of speed at which atoms typically move within a sample material at a given temperature, I assume there is some type of formula.

Would said formula have to take material Z into account?
 
  • #4
solo-mfg said:
Thanks, I figured I had it right, but thought I might as well ask a few experts.

Would I also be correct to say that you could shift the energy of a gamma emission by accelerating the radioisotope?

example Cs-137 particle in a linear accelerator.

If the emission is 661 KeV and your accelerator is 200KeV, would you observe an 861KeV gamma emission in one direction and a 461KeV gamma in the exact opposite?

Cs-137 nucleus accelerated to 200KeV energy is moving relatively slowly (not relativistic), thus blue/red shifting is small. Cs-137 needs to have many GeVs of kinetic energy to have relativistic velocity.

If I am using a detector to analyze and identify an unknown radioisotope, are there shifts in KeV due to movements of the atoms relative to the detector?

that is to say I am wondering if the temperature of the radioisotope makes a difference when measuring the KeV spikes?

The temperature of 11600K is equivalent to average energy of thermal motions of only 1 eV.
Unless you are measuring gammas from an early thermonuclear fireball, you can safely disregard Doppler shift due to thermal motions.
 
  • #5
nikkkom said:
Cs-137 nucleus accelerated to 200KeV energy is moving relatively slowly (not relativistic), thus blue/red shifting is small. Cs-137 needs to have many GeVs of kinetic energy to have relativistic velocity.

Well, even for slow motions, you can have some Doppler shift. It all depends on your detection mechanism. For example, spectroscopical observations in a lab (due to lasers) are "sensitive" even to small velocities of the atoms in your target. That's the reason some mechanisms exist to cool down the matterial + trap it.
 

1. How do relativistic effects affect radiation sources?

Relativistic effects can significantly alter the behavior of radiation sources. As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and time slows down. This can lead to changes in the frequency and intensity of emitted radiation, as well as the direction in which it is emitted.

2. What is the difference between relativistic and non-relativistic radiation sources?

Non-relativistic radiation sources, such as traditional X-ray machines, operate at speeds much lower than the speed of light and therefore do not exhibit significant relativistic effects. Relativistic radiation sources, on the other hand, operate at speeds close to the speed of light and are affected by the changes in mass and time that come with it.

3. How does the energy of relativistic radiation sources compare to non-relativistic ones?

Relativistic radiation sources have much higher energies than non-relativistic ones due to the increase in mass as the object approaches the speed of light. This allows them to produce more powerful and potentially dangerous forms of radiation, such as gamma rays and high-energy particles.

4. What are some real-world examples of relativistic radiation sources?

Some common examples of relativistic radiation sources include particle accelerators, such as the Large Hadron Collider, and astronomical objects like pulsars and quasars. These sources are able to reach incredibly high speeds and energies, producing radiation that can be observed and studied by scientists.

5. How do scientists account for relativistic effects in their research on radiation sources?

Scientists use mathematical equations, such as the Lorentz transformation, to account for relativistic effects in their research on radiation sources. They also conduct experiments and simulations to observe and measure the behavior of relativistic particles and radiation, allowing them to better understand and predict their effects.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
896
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
802
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
709
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
932
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top