Can index swapping be applied to relativistic Lagrangian equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of index swapping in the context of relativistic Lagrangian equations, specifically the Lagrangian density $$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu \nu}F_{\mu \nu} $$ and its equivalence to $$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}) $$. The key point established is that index swapping is permissible due to the summation convention, which allows for the interchange of dummy indices without altering the outcome of the summation. This principle is crucial for manipulating tensor equations in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of the summation convention in index notation
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetism, particularly the electromagnetic field tensor $$ F^{\mu \nu} $$
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the electromagnetic field tensor $$ F^{\mu \nu} $$ in detail
  • Explore the implications of the summation convention in tensor analysis
  • Learn about the derivation and applications of Lagrangian mechanics in relativistic contexts
  • Investigate advanced topics in field theory, such as gauge invariance and symmetries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone interested in advanced topics in Lagrangian mechanics and tensor calculus.

bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Show that

$$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu \nu}F_{\mu \nu} = - \frac{1}{2}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}) $$

Where $$ F^{\mu \nu} = \partial^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}A^{\mu} $$

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


$$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F^{\mu \nu}F_{\mu \nu} = -\frac{1}{4}(\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}A^{\mu})(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}) $$
Which expands out to:
$$ -\frac{1}{4} \bigg( \partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu} -\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}+\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu} \bigg) $$

So if I just exchange indices on half of the terms, and then take out a factor, I get to the result I want... question is, how am I allowed to do that??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does not matter what you call summation indices, in general
$$
\sum_\mu V_\mu W^\mu = \sum_\nu V_\nu W^\nu.
$$
The only difference in your expression is that the summation convention is being used and therefore we do not write out the sums explicitly but always sum over repeated indices.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K