Relativistic momentum (Lorentz boost) low velocity limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of momentum and energy using Lorentz boosts in the context of low velocities. The user queries why the relativistic transformation for energy, E′=γE+γvpx, appears to differ from the Galilean transformation, particularly in the sign of the term involving momentum. A participant clarifies that the correct relativistic transformation should be E′=γE-γvpx, highlighting a sign error in the user's understanding. The conversation emphasizes the algebraic manipulation required to reconcile the two frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with Galilean transformations
  • Basic knowledge of momentum and energy concepts in physics
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Explore the implications of relativistic momentum and energy equations
  • Learn about the differences between relativistic and classical mechanics
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of limits in physics, particularly low-velocity limits
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of special relativity and the comparison between relativistic and classical mechanics.

Neutrinos02
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hello,

If I have a momenta pμ=(E,px,py,pz) and transform it via lorentz boost in x-direction with velocity v I'll get for the new 0th component E′=γE+γvpx why is this in the limit of low velocities the same as transforming the energy by a galilei transformation with velocity v? For γvpx i get something like vpx+O(v³) and with a galilei transformation I'll have terms (with px=mu) like 1/2m(u−v)²=1/2mu²−vpx+1/2mv². So in the relativistic case I got the wrong sing for vpx+O(v³)and lost the 1/2mv²? Did I make a mistake?

Thanks for help
Neutrinos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the sign error, if if you have (u-v) in the Galilean case, you need E′=γE-γvpx for the corresponding relativistic case. The rest is just algebra, but I am not disposed to work it out right now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K