Relativistic quantum mechanics

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
32 replies · 3K views
For example, the Dirac equations should be of the form:
$$(\partial_0 - \partial_1 + i\partial_2)\psi_1 + \partial_3 \psi_2 = - im\psi_4$$
Plus three more similar equations. There's no immediate way to decouple these: they are fundamentally equations for a four-component spinor. Certainly the SDE is nowhere to be seen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure you get the non-relativistic limit by a formal expansion with respect to powers of ##1/c##, and also choosing a convenient representations for the Dirac matrices to do that. E.g., if you minimally couple the em. field you are lead to the Pauli equation with a Pauli spinor (throughing away the anti particles). All this can be found in Bjorken&Drell.
 
redtree said:
the Schrödinger equation is a component of the Dirac equation

No, it isn't, it's a non-relativistic approximation to it, as has already been pointed out.

The OP question has been answered. Thread closed.