Relativistically Invariant Tensors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Duck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Tensors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
The_Duck
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
108
In special relativity, the metric tensor is invariant under Lorentz transformations:

[tex]\Lambda^\alpha{}_\mu \Lambda^\beta{}_\nu g^{\mu \nu} = g^{\alpha \beta}[/tex]

Is this the unique rank 2 tensor with this property, up to a scaling factor? How would I go about proving that?

I know that two rank 4 tensors with this property are the completely antisymmetric [tex]\epsilon^{\mu \nu \sigma \rho}[/tex] and the completely symmetric [tex](g^{\mu \nu} g^{\sigma \rho} + g^{\mu \sigma} g^{\nu \rho} + g^{\mu \rho} g^{\nu \sigma})[/tex]. My guess is that any rank 4 tensor invariant under Lorentz transformations is a linear combination of these two. I haven't been able to prove that, though. Any hints?

What about other ranks? I can see that for even ranks I can go on constructing completely symmetric relativistically invariant tensors from the metric tensor as for rank 4. I can also see that there is no invariant rank 1 tensor. My conjecture is that there are none of odd rank, and that except for the completely antisymmetric rank 4 tensor all such tensors are completely symmetric and built from the metric tensor much like the rank 4 one.

I'm asking about this because I just completed a homework problem which would have taken me about 3 fewer pages if I could have just said, "This completely symmetric tensor is invariant under Lorentz tranformation. Therefore it must have this form: ..."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If g and g' are invariant then [itex]g^{-1}g'[/itex] commutes with all [itex]\Lambda[/itex] and therefore g' is proportional to g.
 
arkajad, thanks, I can see now why there is a unique rank 2 invariant. I've found that chapter 34 of Srednicki's QFT book talks about these "invariant symbols" so I will read that.