Relativity Theory: General & Special Contexts

[MoradLemans]

I want to know in which context should i take relativity with both general and special .

 

[jtbell]

I'm sorry, I don't understand your question, and I suspect nobody else will, either. Can you explain it further?

 

[phinds]

I'm sorry, I don't understand your question, and I suspect nobody else will, either. Can you explain it further?

I certainly don't.

 

[HallsofIvy]

What do you mean by "context"?

 

[MoradLemans]

Is it classified in Quantum Mechanics or Classical Mechanics ?

 

[ZapperZ]

Is it classified in Quantum Mechanics or Classical Mechanics ?

Why does this matter so much?

BTW, it is not Quantum Mechanics.

Zz.

 

[mfb]

Relativity is its own field. It is neither classical mechanics nor quantum mechanics.

 

[MoradLemans]

Relativity is its own field. It is neither classical mechanics nor quantum mechanics.

Why relativity is an independent field ?

 

[mfb]

Because it is neither classical mechanics nor quantum mechanics...

 

[phinds]

Hm. This post seems to have been edited such that it appears to be a response to mfg, which is was not. I'm going to delete the content to avoid confusion.

 

[drvrm]

Because it is neither classical mechanics nor quantum mechanics...

Is it classified in Quantum Mechanics or Classical Mechanics ?

i think you wish to know whether 'quantum' ideas can be incorporated in relativity whether its STR or GTR- i think till the quantization of 'graviton'
or discovery of a particle which can mediate /connect the action of 'gravity field' or say 'quantization of gravitation' does not come up -it can not be said to be a part of quantum physics.
so its a classical theory encompassing the four dimensional space-time.-where time has been given a special status of coordinates and forces are derived from the curvature of space-time fabric.

 

[phinds]

so its a classical theory ...

but you need to be clear that you are not telling him that it is classical mechanics.

 

[PeterDonis]

Is it classified in Quantum Mechanics or Classical Mechanics ?

How are you defining "Classical Mechanics"? Some people define it as "everything that isn't Quantum Mechanics", in which case SR and GR would both be "Classical". But that's not a very informative definition.

The more common definition, which is the one the other posters are using, defines "Classical Mechanics" to mean Newtonian mechanics: Newton's three laws of motion and his law of gravity. SR and GR are not "Classical Mechanics" by this definition; they are "Relativistic Mechanics", which is a separate field of its own.

 

[drvrm]

but you need to be clear that you are not telling him that it is classical mechanics.

well sorry -i should have said that
its a classical theory but not 'classical mechanics' as its a development based on space-time description of events so its treated outside mechanics- but relativistic dynamics is 'classical'..

 

[MoradLemans]

well sorry -i should have said that
its a classical theory but not 'classical mechanics' as its a development based on space-time description of events so its treated outside mechanics- but relativistic dynamics is 'classical'..

Thank you very much !

 

[vanhees71]

Because it is neither classical mechanics nor quantum mechanics...

This I don't understand either. Relativity is an unfortunate name for "space-time model". So it's comprehensive for all of physics, classical and quantum. The special theory is an approximation to the general in neglecting gravity.