Removal of 1 g from accelerometer

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mark2468
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerometer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of removing the gravitational component (1g) from accelerometer readings when the device is in static positions. Participants explore methods to achieve a zero reading at rest and accurately reflect linear acceleration along the relevant axes when the device is tilted or in motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a formula to achieve a reading of 0,0,0 when the accelerometer is static, regardless of its angle.
  • Another participant suggests that while it may be possible to "zero" or calibrate the accelerometer, distinguishing between gravitational force and linear acceleration is fundamentally challenging, as they are indistinguishable in a gravitational field.
  • A participant expresses that they have a method to determine position and seeks to achieve a reading of 0,0,0 at rest, with the ability to reflect acceleration in the z-plane as a non-zero value.
  • One response indicates that knowing the orientation of the accelerometer relative to true vertical is essential for achieving the desired readings.
  • A participant discusses the idea of normalizing values and poses a question about solving for the z-component when given specific values that maintain a magnitude of 1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of achieving the desired readings, and multiple competing views regarding the calibration and interpretation of accelerometer data remain present.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the methods for determining orientation and the mathematical steps necessary to achieve the desired readings. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the definitions of rest and acceleration in the context of gravitational effects.

mark2468
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I was wondering if it is possible to remove the 1g (sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)) from an accelerometer when in static positions.

When the device is tilted to different positions the total g-force does not equal 1 and differs quite a bit from position to position.

I would like to be able to have the device at a particular angle which gives a reading of 0,0,0 as the device is static (angle not important) and when linear acceleration is experienced thay it just shows on the relevant axis.

Is there a formula that can achieve this?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can likely be "zeroed", or calibrated in a way that you redefine the force of gravity to be zero g's. But that's not really what you're asking about, and I hate to disappoint, but, as Einstein would tell you, rest in the presence of a gravitational field and linear acceleration are indistinguishable. There is no way to teach an accelerometer to learn the difference between sitting on a table and accelerating through space in a rocket ship at 9.8 m/s^2. However, robotics engineers have done some clever things by adding gyroscopes and other components to their setup.
 
I'm not really to worried about rest and linear acceleration as i have a method that determines the position. What I really want is to have a reading of 0,0,0 at rest and then if it accelerates let's say for example in the z-plane that the reading might look something like 0,0,0.2 or 0,0,-0.7. Can this be done.

Thanks.
 
If you have orientation of the accelerometer, yes. What you need to know is which way the true vertical points relative to the X, Y, and Z of accelerometer.
 
with the values like:

0.6, 0.6, 0.53.

The magnitude is 1 so therefore could just subtract each element from itself to get:

0, 0, 0.

but if there acceleration in z direction which gives something like:

0.6, 0.6, 0.6, or 0.6, 0.6, 0.8. and to get a normalized value:

0,0,z.

How can I solve for z?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K