Gold Member
- 2,833
- 12,512
In addition to your points, the current war based disturbances in petrochemical supplies will only further add to the pressures for changes in our energy supplies.Ken Fabian said:Tipping points on costs have been crossed and nothing will be the same. No Canuting this tide, which at this point is largely driven by 'free' market choices, ie cost. With, I suspect, advantage of convenience; whilst waiting on some kind of overarching long range plan from policy makers that may never come... add some more solar and wind, which growth gives strong incentives to the storage side, with batteries the emergent quick and ready interim solution to bottlenecks that is morphing into a longer term, larger scale option.
That doesn't assure we can successfully decarbonise sufficiently to stabilise the climate system and still maintain high levels of prosperity, let alone do so in a timely manner but it does undercut the more egregious alarmist fears of economic harms from commitment to trying.
Even where there is political opposition and obstruction (to 'save' economies from having to change how they make and use energy) the urge towards climate accountability and decarbonising isn't going to go away.
What an interesting term that I had never hear of!Ken Fabian said:No Canuting this tide
I like to imagine that in the bleak future of runaway climate catastrophe the desperate Greta Thunberg, in her later years, will have turned to dark science, combining occult and relativity to travel back in time in order to change the flow of history.BillTre said:the current war based disturbances
Bandersnatch said:the only way to wean the world off fossil fuels before the clock runs out is to start a couple of big pointless wars that will drive global petrol prices beyond palatability.
Quite true. That was when the greenhouse effect was discovered, to explain the excess heat of the planet Venus.Ken Fabian said:Actually, meant to write 'even by the end of the 1800's'. (Foreseeable that the world would warm from adding CO2.)
Is this an argument you'd take to one of our fallen soldier's families or the school children's families we bombed in Iran?Hornbein said:Though the populace will prove ungrateful.
Strictly for PhysicsForums consumption. Somehow I have never been consulted about the wars.Greg Bernhardt said:Is this an argument you'd take to one of our fallen soldier's families or the school children's families we bombed in Iran?