Replacing 10kip Load at 2ft: Understanding Forces and Moments in Beam Structures

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of replacing a 10 kip load at a specific point on a beam structure to accurately analyze shear and moment diagrams. Participants explore the implications of this replacement on the calculations of internal forces and moments, focusing on the concepts of free body diagrams and the effects of external loads on beam behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that replacing the 10 kip load is unnecessary if only end reactions are calculated, while others contend that it is essential for accurate shear and moment diagrams.
  • One participant notes that the sharp drop in shear at point D and the rise in moment can only be identified by isolating the beam in a free body diagram.
  • There is a question about why the drop in shear force at a distance from point D is not perceptible, despite understanding the moment change at D.
  • Another participant explains that the force at D results from the force exerted on a bracket, detailing the relationship between forces and moments as per Newton's third law.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding the direction of forces and moments at point D, highlighting a perceived contradiction in earlier statements about the shear force and moment directions.
  • Clarification is provided that the beam exerts an upward force and counterclockwise moment on the bracket, which in turn exerts a downward force and clockwise moment on the beam.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the necessity of replacing the load for accurate analysis, with some asserting it is essential while others believe it is not. There is also confusion about the directions of forces and moments, indicating a lack of consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific values and directions of forces and moments, but there are unresolved questions about the implications of these values on the overall analysis of the beam. The discussion does not resolve the assumptions underlying the calculations or the definitions of forces and moments.

chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Why we need to replace the 10kip load at 2ft from D to D ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMO it's wrong ... There's no need to do that .
 

Attachments

  • 383.PNG
    383.PNG
    25.5 KB · Views: 480
  • 384.PNG
    384.PNG
    34.8 KB · Views: 528
  • 385.PNG
    385.PNG
    32.5 KB · Views: 486
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you don't need to do that if you just wanted to calculate the end reactions, but if you want to look at shear and moment diagrams in the beam, it is a must. Otherwise your shear and monent diagrams would not be correct, for example, the couple at D wouldn't show. Use free body diagram for the beam.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
Well you don't need to do that if you just wanted to calculate the end reactions, but if you want to look at shear and moment diagrams in the beam, it is a must. Otherwise your shear and monent diagrams would not be correct, for example, the couple at D wouldn't show. Use free body diagram for the beam.
Why my shear force diagram and bending moment diagram would be incorrect if I want to do so?
 
chetzread said:
Why my shear force diagram and bending moment diagram would be incorrect if I want to do so?
Notice the sharp 10 K drop in shear at D in the shear diagram, and the sharp 20 ft-kips rise in moment at D in the moment diagram. You won't be able to discover that unless you isolate the beam from the bracket on a free body diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
Notice the sharp 10 K drop in shear at D in the shear diagram, and the sharp 20 ft-kips rise in moment at D in the moment diagram. You won't be able to discover that unless you isolate the beam from the bracket on a free body diagram.
Why we wouldn't be able to feel the drop in shear force at 2m from D?

I can understand that we can feel the drop in moment 20 NM at D since moment = force X distance and moment produced is at D...
 
chetzread said:
Why we wouldn't be able to feel the drop in shear force at 2m from D?

I can understand that we can feel the drop in moment 20 NM at D since moment = force X distance and moment produced is at D...
And the force at D on the beam comes from the force exerted on the bracket at E. If you draw a free body diagram (FBD) of the bracket DE, the 10 kip force at E produces an end reaction at D on the bracket of 10 kips force up and 20 ft-k moment ccw . By Newtons 3rd law, the bracket at D exerts a 10 k downward force and 20 ft-k cw moment on the beam. That is what the main beam 'feels' internally , it doesn't much care about the bracket.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
the 10 kip force at E produces an end reaction at D on the bracket of 10 kips force up and 20 ft-k moment ccw . By Newtons 3rd law, the bracket at D exerts a 10 k downward force and 20 ft-k cw moment on the beam.
I am confused... In the beginning, you said that the moment at D is CCW , and shear force is upwards, then you said that according to Newtons 3rd law, the shear force is downward at D, and moment is cw at D?
 
chetzread said:
I am confused... In the beginning, you said that the moment at D is CCW , and shear force is upwards, then you said that according to Newtons 3rd law, the shear force is downward at D, and moment is cw at D?
What I said was that the beam exerts an upward force and ccw moment on the vertical part of the bracket, and that therefore in accord with Newton 3, the vertical part of the bracket exerts a downward force and cw moment on the beam. When looking at the beam, the force exerted at D is down and the moment at D is cw, as per book example.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K