Representing a curve with a vector valued function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around representing a curve using vector-valued functions, specifically focusing on the choice of parameterization for the x-component of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of using different parameterizations, such as x=2sint versus x=2cost, and question the equivalence of these choices. There is an attempt to understand the relationship between these parameterizations and their effects on the resulting vector-valued function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the equivalence of the parameterizations, while others express confusion about the reasoning behind this equivalence. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a directive from the professor to avoid using the given parameters in the textbook, which adds a layer of complexity to the discussion regarding acceptable parameterizations.

dietcookie
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See attached image


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Why use x=2sint??

Would it be incorrect to use the x=2cost (versus the given x=2sint)? My professor instructed us to not use the given parameters in the book and to come up with our own, and I would of used x=2cost which would of changed the resulting vector-valued function (Resulting in r = 2Cos(t)i+2Sin(t)j+4Cos2tk)

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • se12a01061.gif
    se12a01061.gif
    13.3 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
Either one is fine. The difference between the two is also the same thing as changing the parameter t into pi/2-t. Do you see why?
 
Last edited:
I understand the identity sin(t)=cos[(pi/2)-t], but I really don't see why using either parameters x=2sint or x=2cost is equivalent. The book wants me to use x=2sint, wouldn't the equivalent then be actually x=2cos([(pi/2)-t]) ? Thanks
 
dietcookie said:
I understand the identity sin(t)=cos[(pi/2)-t], but I really don't see why using either parameters x=2sint or x=2cost is equivalent. The book wants me to use x=2sint, wouldn't the equivalent then be actually x=2cos([(pi/2)-t]) ? Thanks

If r(t) is a curve then r(a-t) represents the same curve. It goes through the same points, just at different values of t.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K