- #1
Steelwolf
- 104
- 179
<Moderator note: moved from https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-there-an-alternative-theory-to-dark-matter.921922/page-3 >
(Editors/Moderators) I would like my previous post put back up, it had been #17, and it detailed, although in laymans terms, so many of the things that have shot down dark matter just like later posts do even if theirs is in detail and quoting papers. I pointed to the HUGE number of papers that have all but done away with dark matter by way of finding previously undetectable baryonic matter. That and the effects of magnetism are overlooked in many cases as far as an attractive force. For example, the "Gravitational Lensing" which there have been problems showing up in it's accuracy and purported mass requirements to form: Question, has anyone considered that they might be reflections instead, with the light rays reflecting at a very shallow angle from microscopic ice flakes that are held to a flat position within the galactic cluster's magnetic field? Would this not give the same TYPE of shape. Could some be actual gravitational lenses and others be magnetically aligned ices?
However, your kneejerk reaction in pulling my post really should be re-looked at in the light of the weight of data you just had land in your lap.
(Editors/Moderators) I would like my previous post put back up, it had been #17, and it detailed, although in laymans terms, so many of the things that have shot down dark matter just like later posts do even if theirs is in detail and quoting papers. I pointed to the HUGE number of papers that have all but done away with dark matter by way of finding previously undetectable baryonic matter. That and the effects of magnetism are overlooked in many cases as far as an attractive force. For example, the "Gravitational Lensing" which there have been problems showing up in it's accuracy and purported mass requirements to form: Question, has anyone considered that they might be reflections instead, with the light rays reflecting at a very shallow angle from microscopic ice flakes that are held to a flat position within the galactic cluster's magnetic field? Would this not give the same TYPE of shape. Could some be actual gravitational lenses and others be magnetically aligned ices?
However, your kneejerk reaction in pulling my post really should be re-looked at in the light of the weight of data you just had land in your lap.
Last edited by a moderator:
