Researching Turboprops: Fuel Comparison of Hydrogen, Methanol, & Jet A1

Click For Summary
Research on turboprop engines comparing the fuel efficiency of Hydrogen, Methanol, and Jet A1 is challenging due to limited legitimate sources. Hydrogen is recognized as a high-performance fuel, but its low density presents significant practical challenges for turboprop applications, leading designers to prefer Jet A1 for its density and storage simplicity. Discussions indicate that while Hydrogen is being explored for automotive use, its application in subsonic aerospace remains impractical. Some academic institutions are considering upgrades to study Hydrogen combustion, highlighting ongoing interest despite the challenges. Overall, the feasibility of Hydrogen as a turboprop fuel is still under scrutiny.
Michael111
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
PSFC of Turboprops, Focusing on Jet A1, Hydrogen and Methanol fuels.
Hello

I'm trying to get some good reference material so I can do a literature review on Turboprops and a comparison of PSFC of Hydrogen/Methanol/Jet A1 fuels for turboprops. If anyone knows any good source material for this please let me know as I have struggled to find anything.

Regards,

Michael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Google search for TSFC of turbojet[/size] may help.

(TSFC = Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption)

Cheers,
Tom
 
I'd echo what Tom.G said. You may be hard-pressed to find any sort of legitimate source for the fielding of Hydrogen for a turboprop engine, though. Hydrogen is an extremely high performing fuel, but the impracticalities encountered when working with a fuel with that low of a density often (if not, universally) cause aircraft designers to make subsonic engines run on some sort of an A1 or jet fuel simply for its density and simplicity of storage. Speaking with faculty at a university lab near me that are looking at the facility upgrades necessary to allow them to expand their combustion lab to begin working with Hydrogen- I can say firsthand that Hydrogen could be considered an "impractical" fuel in many use cases. You see it used in rocket engines where every corner must be cut for performance.

That being said, Hydrogen is being investigated as an alternative fuel for automobiles (yes, that's right), so as outlandish as it may seem to use it for a turboprop, culture and politics can play a strong enough role to cause the world to look into Hydrogen for the automobile... So feel free, room, to sanity check me on any investigations being made into Hydrogen for subsonic aerospace applications.
 
Thread 'General principle of turbomachinery: true also for rocket turbopumps?'
A rule of thumb of aircraft engineers is every 10% increase in the power level engines are run at corresponds to a 50% decrease in engine lifetime. This is a general phenomenon of turbomachinery. Then it is likely it also holds for rocket turbopumps. Then quite key is the rule also holds in reverse, every decrease in power level by 10% can result in doubling the lifetime of the engine. Then by running the engine at 0.9^5 = 0.60 power level can result in 2^5 = 32 times longer lifetime. For...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
67K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K