Residue theorem for integral of real sinusodial function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the residue theorem in complex analysis, particularly in the context of integrating real sinusoidal functions. Participants are exploring the choice of contour for integration, especially when using the substitution \( z = e^{i \theta} \) and how it relates to the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the rationale behind choosing the unit circle as the contour for integration, particularly in relation to the limits of integration. They are also considering alternative contours for different limits, such as a semi-circle for integration from 0 to pi, and discussing the implications of enclosing singularities within the contour.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the relationship between the contour choice and the properties of the function being integrated. Some have provided insights into the implications of the Cauchy Integral Theorem and the residue theorem, while others express confusion regarding the necessity of specific contours and the impact of enclosing poles.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of contour integration and the conditions under which the residue theorem applies, including the presence of singularities and the regularity of functions within chosen contours. There is an acknowledgment of varying contour choices and their effects on the integral's value.

MadMax
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I've seen a few examples but don't understand how the contour is chosen.

We use the substitution

[tex]z=e^{i \theta}[/tex]

If the integral is over -pi to pi, or over 0 to 2*pi, then the contour is the unit circle centred on the origin.

My questions:

1.) Why?

2.) What would the contour be if we were integrating over 0 to pi?

My attempts at answers:

1.) Is it because the subtitution we use is the usual parameterization of the unit circle? (I read that somewhere but to be honest I don't really understand what it means). Or is it a full circle because we are integrating over a full circle (0 to 2*pi) in the original limits of integration? In which case why is it a unit circle, why couldn't its radius be larger or smaller? How do we chose the radius of the circle contour?

2.) Would it be a unit semi-circle centred on the origin? If so which 2 quartiles of the imaginary plane would it cover? Or would it still be a unit circle centred on the axis?

Any answers/help/hints/tips would be much appreciated. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the Cauchy Integral Theorem?
 
Yes I think. It tells us that any integral over a closed contour in the complex plane is equal to zero if the function is regular on or within that contour. If there are singularities (poles) within the contour then we apply the residue theorem and find the value of the integral equal to 2*pi*i * [sum of residues of the poles]. Right?

All very well, but some integrals have several poles, and depending on which contour you choose you may or may not enclose these singularities. You have to choose a contour that is regular at all points for that function. But in all the examples I looked at they chose the unit circle centred on the radius, and in one of them this meant the pole at z = 2 wasn't enclosed, but they could have chosen a circle of radius 3 or 4 or even infinity and the function would still be regular at all points on the contour. I'm confused.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
The integral theorem essentially proves that (provided there are no poles in between them) two contour integrals are going to have the same value. So the result will be the same if r=1 or if r=3, provided you're not changing what poles are on the inside.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K