Resistance in Parallel Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total resistance in a parallel circuit is calculated using the formula 1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3. An alternative expression, R = 1/(1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3), is mathematically equivalent but less commonly used. The preference for the 1/R expression is due to its simplicity and ease of memorization, similar to how Newton's second law is typically presented as F = ma. Both forms of the equation are valid, but the standard convention favors the first for educational purposes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parallel circuit theory
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law
  • Basic knowledge of electrical resistance
  • Concept of current flow in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of using different forms of circuit equations
  • Learn about series vs. parallel circuits in electrical engineering
  • Explore practical applications of Ohm's Law in circuit design
  • Study the historical context of electrical formulas and their educational significance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, educators teaching circuit theory, and professionals involved in circuit design and analysis.

CheesyPeeps
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
The formula to find the total resistance in a parallel circuit is 1/R=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3, but wouldn't it be easier to use R=1/(1/R1+1/R2+1/R3)? I've only ever seen the equation written like that once before, and I'm wondering if there's a reason as to why it's never really used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's easier to use depends on what you have and where you want to go.
The 1/R expression is easier to understand and to remember:

Voltage is the same for all R
Total current = Voltage / Total resistance
Total current = Sum of individual currents = Sum ( Voltage / Individual resistance i )​

Divide by Voltage and you get the 1/R = Sum (1/Ri )
 
CheesyPeeps said:
I'm wondering if there's a reason as to why it's never really used?
It is USED plenty. Students are expected to be able to divide easily.

Similarly, Newton's 2nd law is almost always written F=ma, even though students are expected to recognize and use the equivalent a=F/m and m=F/a.
 
Thanks! I suppose it does make sense that we don't write it that way.
 
What others said. The two equations are mathematically the same. If anything the second form of the equation is used more frequently.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
616
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K