Resistance In Series/Parallel circuits

Click For Summary
To find the total resistance in the circuit, start by identifying resistors that can be combined in series or parallel. Combine resistors R2 and R3, R5 and R6, and R7 and R8 in parallel, while keeping R1, R4, and R9 in series. It’s important to ensure that resistors are correctly identified as either in series or parallel based on their connections. The process involves collapsing combinations in stages, simplifying the circuit step by step. Following this method will lead to the correct total resistance calculation.
Mark Rice
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I need to find the total resistance of a circuit (attached file). I'm pretty sure it's really and straight forward but I'm a chemical engineer and this is coursework so just wanted to make sure I was doing it right.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I just simplify by adding the following to each other in series to give three resistor value (R2+R3) (R4+R5+R6) (R7+R8) then work it out using these in the parallel question? ie Rcircuit= R1 + R9 + [(1/Rtotal)=1/(R2+R3) + 1/(R4+R5+R6)] + 1/(R7+R8)]I totally appreciate they way I have just typed this was not very clear so I'm happy to explain myself more!

*Edited*
 

Attachments

  • Resistor.png
    Resistor.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 481
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark Rice said:
Do I just simplify by adding the following to each other in series to give three resistor value (R2+R3) (R4+R5+R6) (R7+R8)
That cannot be right because R4 is not parallel to R7 and R8. But you have the right approach - collapse combinations in stages, starting with the simplest ones.
 
haruspex said:
That cannot be right because R4 is not parallel to R7 and R8. But you have the right approach - collapse combinations in stages, starting with the simplest ones.

So do I add R1 + R4 + R9 in series. Then do the parallel calculation [(1/Rtotal)=1/(R2+R3) + 1/(R5+R6)] + 1/(R7+R8)]? Sorry not done physics in 3 years so I'm a bit rusty!
 
Mark Rice said:
So do I add R1 + R4 + R9 in series. Then do the parallel calculation [(1/Rtotal)=1/(R2+R3) + 1/(R5+R6)] + 1/(R7+R8)]? Sorry not done physics in 3 years so I'm a bit rusty!

Is this what I do anyone?
 
Mark Rice said:
So do I add R1 + R4 + R9 in series.
Not R4. There's a connection with other resistors in between R1 and R4.
In general, you look for:
- two resistors in sequence with no other connection between them; if found, combine them, adding resistances
- two resistors joined to each other at both ends; if found, combine them using the parallel resistance rule
- repeat as necessary
Yes, you can combine 2 with 3, 5 with 6, and 7 with 8. What next?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K