Resistance In Series/Parallel circuits

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total resistance in a circuit involving both series and parallel resistor configurations. The original poster, a chemical engineer, seeks clarification on the correct approach to simplify the circuit's resistances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of simplifying the circuit by combining resistors in series and parallel. There is an exploration of the correct combinations, with some questioning the original poster's assumptions about the arrangement of resistors.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, providing guidance on how to correctly combine resistors. There is an ongoing exploration of the circuit's configuration, with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of identifying connections between resistors and the need to clarify the circuit's layout. The original poster expresses uncertainty due to a lack of recent experience with physics concepts.

Mark Rice
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I need to find the total resistance of a circuit (attached file). I'm pretty sure it's really and straight forward but I'm a chemical engineer and this is coursework so just wanted to make sure I was doing it right.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I just simplify by adding the following to each other in series to give three resistor value (R2+R3) (R4+R5+R6) (R7+R8) then work it out using these in the parallel question? ie Rcircuit= R1 + R9 + [(1/Rtotal)=1/(R2+R3) + 1/(R4+R5+R6)] + 1/(R7+R8)]I totally appreciate they way I have just typed this was not very clear so I'm happy to explain myself more!

*Edited*
 

Attachments

  • Resistor.png
    Resistor.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark Rice said:
Do I just simplify by adding the following to each other in series to give three resistor value (R2+R3) (R4+R5+R6) (R7+R8)
That cannot be right because R4 is not parallel to R7 and R8. But you have the right approach - collapse combinations in stages, starting with the simplest ones.
 
haruspex said:
That cannot be right because R4 is not parallel to R7 and R8. But you have the right approach - collapse combinations in stages, starting with the simplest ones.

So do I add R1 + R4 + R9 in series. Then do the parallel calculation [(1/Rtotal)=1/(R2+R3) + 1/(R5+R6)] + 1/(R7+R8)]? Sorry not done physics in 3 years so I'm a bit rusty!
 
Mark Rice said:
So do I add R1 + R4 + R9 in series. Then do the parallel calculation [(1/Rtotal)=1/(R2+R3) + 1/(R5+R6)] + 1/(R7+R8)]? Sorry not done physics in 3 years so I'm a bit rusty!

Is this what I do anyone?
 
Mark Rice said:
So do I add R1 + R4 + R9 in series.
Not R4. There's a connection with other resistors in between R1 and R4.
In general, you look for:
- two resistors in sequence with no other connection between them; if found, combine them, adding resistances
- two resistors joined to each other at both ends; if found, combine them using the parallel resistance rule
- repeat as necessary
Yes, you can combine 2 with 3, 5 with 6, and 7 with 8. What next?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K