Resistance of a wire around the Earth

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter godiswatching_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Resistance Wire
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the resistance of a wire wrapped around the Earth, specifically examining how an increase in the radius of the wire affects its resistance. Participants explore the calculations involved in determining the change in resistance based on the change in length of the wire due to the increase in radius.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines their approach using the formula for resistance and calculates the change in resistance based on an increase in radius by one meter.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the initial participant's reasoning, suggesting that the simplicity of the solution may indicate a potential oversight.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations independently, suggesting that confidence in one's work is essential.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the physical intuition behind the problem, questioning whether a small increase in wire length can indeed result in a significant change in height around the Earth.
  • One participant provides a mathematical justification for the change in circumference due to the increase in radius, reinforcing the calculations presented earlier.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the intuitiveness of the problem and the validity of the calculations. While some find the calculations sound, others remain skeptical about the implications of the results, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

There is a reliance on the assumption that the increase in radius directly correlates to the change in circumference and resistance, which may not account for all physical factors involved.

godiswatching_
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Homework statement in the image.
Relevant Equations
$$R=\rho\frac{l}{A}$$
$$l=2\pi r$$
Hey! I had a question about this problem.

I did (1) Using
$$R_{0}=\rho\frac{l}{A}$$

For (2) I assume the question means that the radius increases by a meter.
So I used $$\bigtriangleup L = 2\pi (r_{E}+1) - l$$
and then I used that L to find the new R. Then I said $$\bigtriangleup R = R-R_{0}$$

Does that seem right? This seems too simple to be right.

My final answer was:
$$\bigtriangleup R = 3.4 \cdot 10^{-4} \Omega$$
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-11-28 at 3.26.38 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-11-28 at 3.26.38 PM.png
    18.7 KB · Views: 145
Physics news on Phys.org
'Too simple' is not an argument ...
What could possible be wrong ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
'Too simple' is not an argument ...
What could possible be wrong ?

##\ ##
I don’t see anything wrong with my steps. I think they are all logically sound. It’s more so that I’m paranoid and don’t want to lose points on homework for no reason really.
 
PF isn't in the business of stamp-approving homework. It wouldn't help anyone. You do your calculation, get a result and check it. Twice if you want, three times if you are paranoid :smile:

Have some faith in your work ... :wink:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
I find it pretty hard to believe that adding a mere 6.28 m of wire is enough to lift it by 1 meter off the ground all the way around the Earth, but it does indeed.
 
vela said:
I find it pretty hard to believe that adding a mere 6.28 m of wire is enough to lift it by 1 meter off the ground all the way around the Earth, but it does indeed.
It seemed unbelievable when I first heard this one, but the math bears it out.
##C = 2\pi r \Rightarrow \Delta C = 2\pi \Delta r## -- this is an equality due to the linearity of this function.
If ##\Delta r = 1 \text{ meter}##, then ##\Delta C = 2\pi \cdot 1 \approx 6.28 \text{ meters}##
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K