Resistance of Quarter-Ring Conductor: Did I Get the Answer Right?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The resistance of a quarter-ring conductor can be calculated using the formula R = (π / (2σh ln(b/a))). This formula is derived by considering the conductor as a series of differential slices, each contributing to the total resistance. The derivation confirms that as the inner radius a approaches zero, the resistance R approaches zero, validating the mathematical integrity of the solution. This approach is applicable for cases where a is approximately equal to b, as well as when a equals zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical coordinates in electromagnetics
  • Familiarity with electrical resistance and conductance concepts
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Basic principles of material conductivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of resistance in cylindrical geometries
  • Explore the implications of varying conductivity in different materials
  • Learn about the behavior of resistive materials as dimensions approach zero
  • Investigate the applications of quarter-ring conductors in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetics and material science, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for anyone involved in the analysis of conductive materials and their geometrical configurations.

mmiguel1
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I just had this problem on my Electromagnetics final. I want to know if I got this right and I can't find the problem with google.

Homework Statement


Consider a conducting quarter-ring.
It can be envisioned as one piece of a hollow cylinder that has been cut into fourths down its length.
The original hollow cylinder would have had inner radius a, outer radius b, and length h.
In cylindrical coordinates the geometry of this quarter ring is: [tex]r \in [a,b][/tex]; [tex]\phi \in [0,\pi/2][/tex]; and [tex]z \in [0,h][/tex];
The material of interest has conductivity [tex]\sigma[/tex]
What is the resistance from the [tex]\phi=0[/tex] end to the [tex]\phi=\pi/2[/tex] end?

Homework Equations


For a conductor with linear geometry down it's length:
[tex]R = \frac{L}{\sigma A}[/tex]
Where L = length and A = cross-sectional area;
[tex]G = \frac{1}{R}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I considered a slice of the conductor corresponding to a differential angle [tex]d \phi[/tex].
The slice is described by:
[tex]r \in [a,b][/tex]; [tex]\phi \in [\phi_0,\phi_0+d\phi][/tex]; and [tex]z \in [0,h][/tex];
Let the resistance of this slice be dR. Since the total conductor is a series combination of these slices, and since series resistances add,
[tex]R = \int dR[/tex]

Within the slice of interest, dR, consider a sub-slice located at radius r with a < r < b.
The sub-slice is described by:
[tex]r \in [r_0,r_0+dr][/tex]; [tex]\phi \in [\phi_0,\phi_0+d\phi][/tex]; and [tex]z \in [0,h][/tex];
Let us call the resistance of this sub-slice dR'. Our original slice, dR, is a parallel combination of many dR' sub-slices. It is therefore more convenient to calculate the conductances for this part of the problem. Define [tex]dG = \frac{1}{dR}[/tex] and [tex]dG' = \frac{1}{dR'}[/tex]. Since parallel conductances add, we have
[tex]dG = \int dG'[/tex]
As the differential values [tex]d\phi[/tex] and [tex]dr[/tex] tend to zero, the subslice of interest is linearized along its length.
We can therefore say
[tex]dG' = \frac{\sigma A}{L} = \frac{\sigma h dr}{r d \phi}[/tex]
Where [tex]A = h dr[/tex] and [tex]L = r d \phi[/tex]
[tex]dG = \int_a^b \frac{\sigma h}{d \phi} \frac{1}{r} dr[/tex]
[tex]dG = \frac{\sigma h}{d \phi} \ln \left (\frac{b}{a} \right )[/tex]
[tex]dR = \frac{d \phi}{\sigma h \ln \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) }[/tex]
[tex]R = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d \phi}{\sigma h \ln \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) }[/tex]
[tex]R = \frac{\pi}{2 \sigma h \ln \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) }[/tex]

I was debating this question with my friends after the final. Each of us got different answers. I think my method is correct but I would like some verification.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your derivation looks fine, and your result is certainly true for the case a≈b as well as a=0.

Here is something to check with your friends: If a=0, then the two ends will be in contact, giving a resistance of 0. Your formula correctly reproduces that, since you are dividing by the ln term which approaches infinity as a→0.

Do any of your friends' answers give R=0 when a=0?
 
I honestly can't really remember. I am glad that you think my derivation makes sense. I just wanted to make sure I didn't violate any rules in math since I have never really dealt with reciprocals of integrals before. Thanks Redbelly98!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K