Resistivity calculation from two-probe resistance measurement of sheet

AI Thread Summary
Calculating resistivity from two-probe resistance measurements requires consideration of contact area geometry, particularly when using point contacts, which theoretically yield infinite resistance. The discussion highlights that the perimeter of each contact area is crucial for accurate calculations. An exact solution can be derived using elliptical equipotentials around each contact area, with the central ellipse acting as the bisector between them. The potential distribution is related to the logarithmic ratio of distances to the centers of these ellipses. Understanding these factors is essential for accurate resistivity calculations.
no_einstein
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
New user has been reminded to please always show their work on schoolwork problems.
Homework Statement
You make a two-probe resistance measurement (probe spacing S) of an infinite sheet (thickness t) of a high-resistance material. How do you calculate the resistivity of the material?
Relevant Equations
R = ohm, rho = ohm*m
I'm really not sure. Obviously I can get the units right with Resistance * thickness, but I assume there's a correction factor here that I can't find anywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I studied this once out of my own interest. I concluded that as stated in post #1 it makes no sense. What you also need to know is the perimeter of each contact area. With point contacts the theoretical resistance is infinite.
If we take those areas to be elliptical, we can have an exact solution with nested elliptical equipotentials around each contact ellipse. The 'central ellipse', i.e. where the one family transmutes into the other, is the perpendicular bisector of the two contact areas. The potential at any point is proportional to the logarithm of the ratio of distances to the 'centres', i.e. where the two families of ellipses would shrink to zero.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top