Resnick Halliday Krane: Venturimeter formula mistake?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Venturimeter formula and potential mistakes in its application, particularly concerning the implications of using fluids of the same density. Participants explore the derivation of the formula, the conditions under which it holds, and the interpretation of pressure differences in the context of Bernoulli's equation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that if the formula were correct, using liquids of the same density would yield a velocity of zero, which seems nonsensical, and suggests a different numerator in their calculation.
  • Another participant proposes that if the two fluids have the same density, the interface will not settle at a fixed height difference, leading to a "flow loop," indicating an implied condition that one fluid's density must be greater than the other.
  • A further contribution emphasizes that filling the apparatus with the same liquid results in two paths with the same pressure difference, suggesting that the manometer only functions correctly when there is no flow.
  • One participant questions their own derivation using Bernoulli's equation, seeking clarification on a potential mistake related to pressure points in the formula.
  • A later reply corrects a formula notation, indicating that the pressures at points should be related correctly and emphasizes the need to account for height differences in Bernoulli's equation when deriving the equation for velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of using fluids of the same density in the Venturimeter formula, with no consensus reached on the correctness of the formula or the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering the conditions under which Bernoulli's equation applies, including the relationship between pressure points and the implications of fluid density on the behavior of the system.

KnightTheConqueror
Messages
16
Reaction score
8
1000125142.jpg

1000125144.jpg


If this formula were to be correct, if we use the liquids in the Venturimeter and the tube to be of the same density, the velocity would come out to be zero which makes no sense. I calculated the formula and got a slightly different numerator. Am I correct?
1000125145.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess would be that it means that if the two fluids has same density then for any speed the interface between them will never "settle" at a fixed height difference but simply make a "flow loop". Or in other words, the formula as it is given has an implied condition that ##\rho' > \rho##.
 
Filip Larsen said:
never "settle" at a fixed height difference but simply make a "flow loop".
Yep. To my intuition (not to be totally relied on) tells me that filling the whole apparatus with the same liquid, you just have two paths with the same pressure difference at each end. The manometer only works when you have no flow through it; it just ends up lop sided according to the pressure difference over the venturi tube.
 
Filip Larsen said:
My guess would be that it means that if the two fluids has same density then for any speed the interface between them will never "settle" at a fixed height difference but simply make a "flow loop". Or in other words, the formula as it is given has an implied condition that ##\rho' > \rho##.
Yes but what mistake did I make in my derivation using the bernoullis equation then?
 
Your formula ##P_1 = P_2 + \rho'gh## should read ##P_a = P_b + \rho'gh##, where points ##a## and ##b## are as shown
1732207203794.png


You'll need to relate the pressures at 1 and 2 to the pressures at ##a## and ##b##.

Bernoulli's equation holds for two points on the same streamline. Note that a streamline passing through points 1 and 2 (shown below) rises by a distance ##h_{12}## in going from 1 to 2. You'll need to take this into account in Bernoulli's equation if you use this streamline.

1732209316401.png

If you take all of this into account, you should be able to derive the equation for ##v_1## given in the textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K