Resolving line tension using vectors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Potat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Tension Vectors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around resolving line tension in a system represented by vectors, focusing on a body in equilibrium affected by multiple forces. Participants explore methods for solving the problem without relying on software, considering both theoretical and practical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a general method for solving tension problems without software, aiming to create functions in Excel for automatic solutions.
  • Another participant notes that the problem is statically indeterminate and cannot be solved without knowing the stiffnesses of the lines.
  • There is a discussion about the assumptions involved, particularly regarding the ability to negate tensions in certain directions based on force application.
  • Participants discuss the meaning of stiffness, with references to Young's modulus and cross-sectional area.
  • One participant suggests that an iterative method may be necessary to account for compression and to set tensions to zero, depending on the conditions of the wires.
  • There is mention of the possibility of writing a finite element analysis (FEA) solver in Excel VBA, with an offer to provide a tutorial for creating such a solver.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions necessary for solving the problem, and there is no consensus on a definitive method or approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best way to handle the complexities of the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their approaches, such as the need for specific stiffness values and the challenges of oversimplifying the problem, which may lead to incorrect solutions.

Potat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how you would go about solving the diagram I have drawn below. It is a simple representation of a body in equilibrium due to the tension of the 4 lines represented as vectors. The two forces are along the respective x and y axis.

With the forces shown one of the lines is useless however but this is necessary as the forces can change direction.

Looking at this instant simultaneous equations don't working without a lot of assumptions, I can solve part the problem with matrices or get an answer using computer software but I am interested in the process to resolve the tensions.

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • Simple.JPG
    Simple.JPG
    7.1 KB · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a statically indeterminate problem so it can't be solved without knowing the stiffnesses of the lines.

What do you mean by "a lot of assumptions"? Like the lines being able to support compression as well as tension?

What's unsatisfactory about the ways you've already solved it? I'm not sure what you're asking for.
 
I'm looking for a general way to solve this type of problem (that doesn't involve modeling it in software) so I can write a series of functions etc. in excel and from the data entered it can automatically solve a series of similar problems. If its possible to do?

The matrix functions in excel are limited and the Reduced row-echelon form function I used on a calculator uses a different process every time so duplicating in excel has numerous issues.

By the stiffness do you mean the young's modulus of the material, or modulus x cross section, or another?

'a lot of assumptions' meaning as the force is the -x direction there is no tension along x-axis on T3 & T4 therefore you can negate it, and visa versa in y-direction, obviously this is not the case and what I am after.
 
Last edited:
Potat said:
By the stiffness do you mean the young's modulus of the material, or modulus x cross section, or another?
Young's modulus x cross sectional area.

'a lot of assumptions' meaning as the force is the -x direction there is no tension along x-axis on T3 & T4 therefore you can negate it, and visa versa in y-direction, obviously this is not the case and what I am after.

You mean you had to oversimplify it and possibly allow wrong solutions?

Have you been able to write a system of equations to describe it?

I would think it certainly requires an iterative method to detect compression and set those tensions to zero. Unless you can make more assumptions. Like are the wires prestressed before the forces are applied? Do you know in advance if any of them are slack? The other way is to write a complete FEA solver in Excel VBA. Are you willing to include 3rd party libraries, say for equation solving? If you want I can send you a simple step-by-step tutorial (5 pages) for writing a 2D truss FEA solver. It would do exactly what you want except for diallowing compressive force. Then you could iterate through this solver to zero the stiffnesses of compressed members.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K