Resonance box with tuning fork, standing wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a resonance box with one closed and one open end, reinforcing sound from a 440 Hz tuning fork. The phenomenon is based on the creation of standing waves, where the closed end acts as a node and the open end as an antinode. The shortest possible length of the resonance box is calculated to be 0.2 meters, derived from the wavelength of the sound. Additionally, the concept of 'end correction' is introduced, indicating that the physical length of the tube is slightly shorter than the resonance length. A complementary question about using multiple tuning forks of the same frequency in the resonance box is also posed.
late347
Messages
300
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


There is a resonance box with one end cloesd and the other end open. The box reinforces the sound of the tuning fork. That sound has frequency of 440 Hz
sound velocity is 340 m/s

a.) What is the basis of the phenomenon in question?
b.) define the shortest possible length of the resonance box

Homework Equations


v= λ * f

The Attempt at a Solution



I winced a little bit when I saw that a.) portion appear in my exam. I decide to skip this question on the basis of not being sure what kind of explanation was "enough"

We had an elective type of exam, choose 5 out of 6 problems. This one I skipped. I feel that I did have a rudimentary understanding of the situation and the basis of the phenomenon, but I was unsure if my understanding was
1) without error
2) good enough of an explanation

But the second question about the length is easier to answer in a more straightforward and mathematical manner. So, I will probably go with reverse order, first B and then A.

b.)

Find the wavelength first

## \lambda = \frac {v} {f} ##
## \lambda = 0.7727m ##

We know that between a node and another node there is ##\frac {\lambda} {2}##
In the resonance box, one wall of the box is closed with a node point, and the other side is open with an antinode.

## \frac {\lambda} {4} = l ##
## l = \frac {0.7727m} {4} = 0.2m ##

a.) explain the basis of the phenomenon

sound is a longitudinal wave, which requires a medium to travel in. The basis of the phenomenon appears to be such that a standing wave is created in the resonance box. And the node point will be the closed-off wall of the box, and the antinode is the open end.
I had a hazy recollection that the antinode is actually defined by the currently prevalent meteorological conditions, since the medium in this case appears to be air.

Standing waves themselves seem to be caused by a superposition of two waves which traveled in opposite directions. If the two waves have same amplitude, wavelength and frequency then it would seem that the standing wave is created.

Precisely how this happens in a resonance box, is a little bit unclear to me. It would seem that the tuning fork is the culprit for creating a sound wave, which is reinforced by the resonance box.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd have given you full marks :smile:
 
Everything sounds clear to me in your explanation. Do you understand why they asked for the shortest possible distance? There are other distances which would also resonate at the frequency (meaning there will be an antinode at the open end, and node at the closed end). How do these distances compare to the shortest distance?
 
The resonance length is fractionally longer than the physical length of the tube.
An 'end correction' must be added to the physical length of the tube, this can be determined experimentally.
 
Hey all! I am experimenting for a sound art project with tuning forks and resonance boxes. I have a complementary question to this thread:

If I have a resonance box specific for 1/4 λ of a given frequency of a tuning fork, can I add several tuning forks (all the same size and freq)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top