I Resonance peak for a driven RLC circuit - Physics 10th Edition

  • Thread starter Thread starter FranzDiCoccio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Resonance
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around reproducing resonance curves for a driven RLC circuit using specified values for resistance, inductance, and capacitance. An initial attempt yielded a flatter curve than expected, prompting questions about the accuracy of the resistance values. It was suggested that the correct curves might be achieved with different resistance values while keeping the original inductance and capacitance. Ultimately, the original poster acknowledged that their curves were correct and expressed a desire to retain the thread for future reference. The conversation highlights common challenges in plotting RLC resonant curves and the importance of precise component values.
FranzDiCoccio
Messages
350
Reaction score
43
TL;DR
I am trying to reproduce the resonance curves at page 925 of "Physics, 10th edition" by Halliday et al.
It seems to me that there is something wrong in the values for the parameters
1738192079036.png

I tried to reproduce these curves. The values for the resistance are shown in the graph. The other values are ##L=100 {\rm \mu H}## and ##C=100 {\rm pF}##.
Using those values I get a much flatter curve, where the value at 0,9 is roughly 83% of the value at 1,00.
Am I missing something?

It seems to me that curves such as those in the figure are obtained with ##R = 0.2 {\Omega}##, ##R = 0.6 {\Omega}## and ##R = 2.0 {\Omega}##. Probably it is possible to obtain the same curves keeping the given values of the resistance and changing ##L## and ##C##.

Thank you for any insight
Francesco

1738192064406.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry my bad. The curves are correct. Forget about it.
I tried to see if I could remove this post, but did not find a way.
 
No need to remove your thread. It will be interesting reading for users in the future searching for help on RLC resonant curve plots. :smile:

FranzDiCoccio said:
The other values are ##L=100 {\rm \mu H}## and ##L=100 {\rm pF}##.
I will fix the typo in your ##C## value though. :wink:
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K