Why Does XL = XC in Capacitor & Inductive Circuit?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between inductive reactance (XL) and capacitive reactance (XC) in LC circuits. When XL equals XC, the theoretical current should approach infinity due to zero impedance (Z). However, in practical scenarios, the presence of resistance prevents infinite current flow, as demonstrated by the heating of wires and the application of Kirchhoff's law. The analysis emphasizes the necessity of deriving the impedance expression specifically for LC circuits rather than relying on RLC circuit equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductive reactance (XL) and capacitive reactance (XC)
  • Familiarity with impedance (Z) in electrical circuits
  • Knowledge of Kirchhoff's laws in circuit analysis
  • Basic concepts of resistance and its effects on current flow
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of impedance for LC circuits
  • Explore the effects of resistance in RLC circuits
  • Learn about superconductors and their impact on current flow
  • Investigate practical applications of Kirchhoff's laws in circuit design
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of LC circuits and the implications of resistance on current flow.

karim102
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,:approve:
I want to know why if XL = XC in circuit which has only capacitor and inductive. The current will be mixmum not infinity because we know the rule which I=V\Z which z is impedance. so the z will be zore so the current must be infinity.:confused:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What you have done is that you have included the resistance in the analysis and that gave you a certain expression for the RLC circuit, but then you removed the resistance (set it to zero) and expected that the same expression would apply, to get the impedance of an LC circuit you must dervie from the circuit an expression of it's own.
 
abdo375 said:
What you have done is that you have included the resistance in the analysis and that gave you a certain expression for the RLC circuit, but then you removed the resistance (set it to zero) and expected that the same expression would apply, to get the impedance of an LC circuit you must dervie from the circuit an expression of it's own.
The expression is still going to be the same even when derived individually
for an LC circuit or we let R tend to 0 in the expression for LCR circuit as the phasor diagram clearly suggests.

In theory the current must indeed rise to infinity.However in practice there is always a resistive element in the circuit (however small) and will probably overheat and short the circuit.
Alternately, the same is the case when the two ends of a battery are connected with no resistance in between.
As per Kischoff's law current in the circuit is infinite right ?
But this is not observed and we see that the wire just heats up.
Maybe if the wire was made of superconducting material we could argue the matter of an infinite current.
 
Your absolutely right I don't know what the hell I was thinking when I wrote this answer.
 
you absolutely right. I see know why there isn't infinite current
 
i think the current will not be infinity becuz there is an internal resistance of the coil (rL) ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K