Rest frames in the early universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of rest frames in the early universe, particularly at times less than 10^-12 seconds after the Big Bang. Participants explore the implications of massless particles and the establishment of spatial relations in a universe dominated by radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that prior to 10^-12 seconds, particles have not acquired mass, leading to the conclusion that there is no rest frame in the universe.
  • Another participant questions the assertion about mass acquisition, noting that the inflaton, which is considered massive, exists during the inflationary epoch, suggesting a need for clarification on which particles are being referred to.
  • A different viewpoint is introduced, stating that while individual massless particles do not have a rest frame, a system of multiple massless particles can create a center of nonzero rest mass, thus establishing a rest frame for the system.
  • One participant acknowledges the high speeds of particles in the early universe and proposes that there exists a universal rest frame defined by the isotropy of radiation temperature, where radiation is blue-shifted or red-shifted depending on motion relative to this frame.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of mass acquisition and the existence of rest frames in the early universe. There is no consensus on the specifics of these concepts, and multiple competing interpretations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining rest frames in a context where particles may not have mass and where high temperatures influence particle behavior. The discussion reflects uncertainties regarding the definitions and implications of mass and rest frames in the early universe.

Karl Coryat
Messages
104
Reaction score
3
Hi folks, I asked a form of this question in another forum and didn't get a satisfying answer.

As I understand it, there is a time in the early universe (t < 10–12 s) when particles have not acquired mass. According to special relativity, massless particles travel at c. Also according to special relativity, a body traveling at c does not have a rest frame. Therefore it would seem that prior to 10–12 s, there is nothing in the universe against which a rest frame can be established.

If that is true, my question is: In what precise sense can we speak of a unique configuration of the universe, with unique spatial relations among particles, etc., at a time when nothing in the universe is capable of measuring such relations?

To put it another way: In physics we learn early on that a human observer is not necessary, that an electron can function as an observer. So how is that expressed in the case when the universe contains only radiation?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Karl Coryat said:
As I understand it, there is a time in the early universe (t < 10–12 s) when particles have not acquired mass.

Is this true? For example, the inflationary epoch takes place much less than 10^-12 seconds, yet the inflaton is massive. Do you mean that the standard model particles have not acquired mass before this time?
 
I didn't know that the inflaton is considered massive.

Another apparent answer is that while no individual massless particle has a rest frame, two or more massless particles moving differently produce a center of nonzero rest mass and therefore a rest frame for the system.

That's interesting, if two light rays with different orientations have a rest mass, but neither does individually. Does anyone know the theory behind this?
 
Karl Coryat said:
Hi folks, I asked a form of this question in another forum and didn't get a satisfying answer.

As I understand it, there is a time in the early universe (t < 10–12 s) when particles have not acquired mass. According to special relativity, massless particles travel at c. Also according to special relativity, a body traveling at c does not have a rest frame. Therefore it would seem that prior to 10–12 s, there is nothing in the universe against which a rest frame can be established.
Well, I don't know about not having acquired mass, but certainly in the very early universe the temperatures were so high that all particles were traveling at very, very close to c. But yes, there is a universal rest frame: the frame in which the the radiation that filled the universe had the same temperature in any direction. Move with respect to this rest frame, and the radiation would be blue-shifted in the direction of motion, red-shifted opposite that direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K