Return to the center of the Earth

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ActaPhysica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Earth Falling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the time it takes to fall to the center of the Earth, focusing on the mathematical approach and integration techniques used. Participants explore the implications of neglecting air resistance and the application of Hooke's Law in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a method involving Newton's law of gravitation and integration to find the time to fall to the Earth's center, questioning the validity of their result.
  • Another participant asserts that the integration performed is incorrect and requests a detailed step-by-step computation to identify the mistake.
  • Some participants clarify that the force described is not Hooke's Law but rather a different linear force, emphasizing the need for correct terminology.
  • A participant attempts to provide a detailed integration process, but others challenge the validity of their separation of variables approach, stating it leads to incorrect results.
  • There is a suggestion to use LaTeX for clearer mathematical expressions and a reminder to consider the nature of gravitational force (attractive vs. repulsive).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the integration methods and the application of Hooke's Law. There is no consensus on the correctness of the calculations or the integration techniques used.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential issues with the integration process, including the treatment of second derivatives and the assumptions made about the force involved. The discussion remains focused on resolving these mathematical uncertainties.

ActaPhysica
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The usual approach for solving for the time it takes to fall to the center of the earth neglects air resistance & uses Hooke's Law. But if you solve it "the hard way"...
The usual approach for solving for the time it takes to fall to the center of the earth neglects air resistance & uses Hooke's Law. But if you solve it "the hard way"...
Gme*m/r^2 = ma
me = 4/3 rho pi r^3
G * 4/3 rho pi r = a
separate variables, integrate twice
r*Ln(r) - r = 2/3 G rho pi t^2
The lower limit of integration (0) has Ln(0) getting large and negative much more slowly than r going to 0, so there's no problem here.
But, this answer gives a very large time. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ActaPhysica said:
G * 4/3 rho pi r = a
This is your ”Hooke’s law”. You are not integrating correctly.
 
It's not my Hooke's Law it's Hooke's Law :)
Can you point out my mistake?
 
ActaPhysica said:
It's not my Hooke's Law it's Hooke's Law :)
Can you point out my mistake?
The point is: It is not Hooke’s law. Hooke’s law relates to the elastic force in a spring or material. It is not simply any linear force.

I already pointed out your mistake: You did not integrate correctly. If you want more detail than that you need to provide your actual computation because your current one is only saying ”integration gives” and then a wrong statement.
 
Well if you integrate 1/r that gives Ln(r)
And if you integrate Ln(r) it gives rLn(r) - r
The other side is pretty straightforward.
 
ActaPhysica said:
Well if you integrate 1/r that gives Ln(r)
And if you integrate Ln(r) it gives rLn(r) - r
The other side is pretty straightforward.
But that is the wrong thing to integrate. So again please show your actual work step by step. If you stubbornly refuse to provide this you are making it impossible to help you.
 
G * 4/3 rho pi r = a = d^2r / dt^2
4/3*G*rho*pi dt^2 = 1/r d^2r
4/3*G*rho*pi *t dt = Ln (r) dr
4/3*G*rho*pi * t^2/2 = r*Ln(r) - r
Is this detailed enough?
 
Last edited:
ActaPhysica said:
TL;DR Summary: The usual approach for solving for the time it takes to fall to the center of the earth neglects air resistance & uses Hooke's Law. But if you solve it "the hard way"...

The usual approach for solving for the time it takes to fall to the center of the earth neglects air resistance & uses Hooke's Law. But if you solve it "the hard way"...
Gme*m/r^2 = ma
me = 4/3 rho pi r^3
G * 4/3 rho pi r = a
separate variables, integrate twice
r*Ln(r) - r = 2/3 G rho pi t^2
The lower limit of integration (0) has Ln(0) getting large and negative much more slowly than r going to 0, so there's no problem here.
But, this answer gives a very large time. What am I doing wrong?
What is your definition for the variable, me ?,
 
ActaPhysica said:
What am I doing wrong?
  1. Try to use LaTeX to make your formulas more readable. For example, your expression for the interior-mass ##m_e## of the earth between its center and the radius ##r(t)## can be written:$$m_{e}(t)=\frac{4\pi}{3}\rho\,r^{3}(t)\tag{1}$$where ##\rho## is the density of the earth (assumed constant).
  2. You wrote the following differential-equation based on Newton's Second Law:$$\frac{4\pi}{3}Gmr(t)=m\ddot{r}(t)\tag{2}$$Think about the sign of the force here. Is gravity repulsive or attractive?
  3. You can't solve a second-order differential equation like (2) by performing two ordinary integrations over each variable ##r## and ##t## separately. Instead, find its solution the same way you'd solve the simple-harmonic-oscillator equation:$$\ddot{x}(t)+\omega^{2}x(t)=0\tag{3}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, PeroK, Orodruin and 1 other person
  • #10
ActaPhysica said:
G * 4/3 rho pi r = a = d^2r / dt^2
4/3*G*rho*pi dt^2 = 1/r d^2r
4/3*G*rho*pi *t dt = Ln (r) dr
4/3*G*rho*pi * t^2/2 = r*Ln(r) - r
Is this detailed enough?
You can't separate variables this way (with second derivatives).
 
  • #11
ActaPhysica said:
G * 4/3 rho pi r = a = d^2r / dt^2
4/3*G*rho*pi dt^2 = 1/r d^2r
4/3*G*rho*pi *t dt = Ln (r) dr
4/3*G*rho*pi * t^2/2 = r*Ln(r) - r
Is this detailed enough?
That’s simply not how separation of variables work with second derivatives. Your separation of variables is incorrect, leading to an incorrect result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K