"Reversal" of Nuclear Decay in Beta Emitters

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential reversal of nuclear decay in beta emitters, specifically through the conversion of protons into neutrons using accelerated electrons at an energy of 1.29 MeV. The Cowan-Reines experiment is referenced, highlighting that while neutrinos are typically involved in this process, other particles can also induce proton-to-neutron conversions. The conversation emphasizes that the energy required for beta decay is determined by the energy difference between nuclear levels, and that the reaction rate is influenced by particle density and cross-section, which can complicate the feasibility of such conversions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beta decay and nuclear reactions
  • Familiarity with the Cowan-Reines experiment
  • Knowledge of weak interactions in particle physics
  • Basic principles of energy levels in nuclear physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Cowan-Reines experiment and its implications for neutrino physics
  • Study the principles of weak interactions and their role in nuclear decay
  • Explore the concept of reaction rates in nuclear physics, focusing on density and cross-section
  • Investigate the theoretical framework of electron capture and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear engineers, and students of particle physics interested in advanced concepts of nuclear decay and interactions.

Aakash Sunkari
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Hello all,

I've got a question on nuclear decay "reversal" in beta emitters.

I've been researching the Cowan-Reines experiment, which used neutrinos to convert protons into neutrons. Recently, I found out that the particle which hits the proton need not necessarily be a neutrino in order to induce a proton-to-neutron conversion. It looks like an energy of 1.29 MeV is enough to convert a proton into a neutron.

That being said, there's a couple of questions that come to mind:

Say that we have a beta emitter which decays to a stable isotope. We use an accelerated electron of 1.29 MeV to convert one of the protons in the nucleus into a neutron.

But does this mean that the isotope will undergo the beta decay again, with the same energy value? Or does there need to be additional energy in order to not just convert a proton to a neutron, but to produce an electron as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can get the reverse reaction with your electron beam then the produced nucleus can do beta decay again, sure. If your electron beam doesn't provide enough energy for a nuclear reaction then there won't be one.
 
"We use an accelerated electron of 1.29 MeV to convert one of the protons in the nucleus into a neutron."
The process is e +p --> n +neutrino. A neutrino must always be involved. 1.29 MeV is the minimum possible energy, but the actual energy is always higher. Any beta decay energy is determined by the energy difference of two nuclear levels.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aakash Sunkari
If it's a proton in a (non-trivial) nucleus then the required energy can be lower or higher. It's no longer sufficient to treat the proton as isolated particle, the binding energy of the parent and possible daughter nucleus has to be considered. In some cases there is not even an energy threshold.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aakash Sunkari
Hi,

this is the state-of-the-art theoretical framework of electron capture
https://arxiv.org/pdf/nucl-th/0001018.pdf

Converting a proton into a neutron, or viceversa, involves weak interaction. As its own name says, it is not likely to happen. Reaction rate is given by

r = n1 * n2 * <sigma*v>

n1, n2 = density of two interacting particles
<sigma*v> = cross section averaged by Boltzmann distribution (it is a function on the temperature)

If cross-sections is low, you will need huge densities.

Coming back to shooting high energy electrons to nuclei... the most likely interaction will be elastic scattering, which was worth a Nobel prize

https://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de...ysics/talks/schweiger_structure_of_nuclei.pdf

Regards,
ORF
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K