Reversible and irreversible reactions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of reversible and irreversible reactions, particularly focusing on adiabatic processes and the electrolysis of water. Participants explore the conditions under which certain processes can be considered reversible and question the inclusion of specific examples in textbooks.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why adiabatic expansion and compression are not included in the examples of reversible reactions, suggesting that these processes could be considered reversible since they return to original states.
  • Another participant asserts that any process can be modeled as reversible if gradients can be made arbitrarily small, implying that adiabatic processes might fit this criterion.
  • Concerns are raised about the classification of electrolysis as a reversible process, with one participant asking how the reverse process occurs without a spark, indicating uncertainty about the conditions required for the reaction to happen.
  • A participant mentions that the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen to form water is reversible, but clarifies that the reverse reaction requires specific conditions, such as the introduction of energy.
  • It is noted that the chemical reaction of hydrogen and oxygen releases energy, contrasting with the energy input required for electrolysis, which raises questions about the nature of reversibility in these processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of adiabatic processes and the conditions under which reactions are reversible. There is no consensus on whether adiabatic processes should be considered reversible or on the specifics of the electrolysis process.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight conditions such as thermal equilibrium and the slowness of processes as important for reversibility, but these conditions may not apply uniformly across all examples discussed, leading to confusion.

ananthu
Messages
105
Reaction score
1
I need some clarification on the following points on the reversible and irreversible reactions.

In the examples cited in textbooks, for reversible reaction, isothermal expansion and compression are given. But the adiabatic exp and comp are not given.

Why is it not included in the list? For example, when a gas is adiabatically expanded, its pressure decreases, volume increases and the temp. falls. But, when the same is adiabatically compressed, again its pressure increases, vol. decreases and temp. increases to their original values in the reverse order. Is it not sufficient to call it reversible change?

Also, another thing I can not understand is the inclusion of electrolysis in the list of reversible process. How does the electrolysis of water fit into the category of reversible process? When electricity is passed into water, the latter splits into hydrogen and oxygen.But how does the reverse happen?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The hydrogen and oxygen will very easily react with each other to form water. Both reactions will start and end with an equal number of parts. There are no wasted parts or unused parts. Hence, reversible. Look it up here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_reaction

Also, I'm not sure, but it doesn't seem right to me that a gas that is expanding or compressing is a reaction at all.
 
Any process (what you call a reaction) could be assumed to be reversible as long as any gradient (in temperature, pressure, chemical potential, etc.) can be made arbitrarily small. If your adiabatic process meets this requirement, you're free to model it as reversible.
 
Drakkith said:
The hydrogen and oxygen will very easily react with each other to form water. Both reactions will start and end with an equal number of parts. There are no wasted parts or unused parts. Hence, reversible.

My doubt is not on that line. What I wanted to clarify is the following: On passing electric current, the water splits into oxygen and hydrogen. Similarly, if the process is reversed the opposite should happen. ie. When electricity is applied to a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen they should form water. Does it actually happen? I think, only when a spark is introduced into the mixture they form water with a "plop".

"Any process (what you call a reaction) could be assumed to be reversible as long as any gradient (in temperature, pressure, chemical potential, etc.) can be made arbitrarily small. If your adiabatic process meets this requirement, you're free to model it as reversible."
(Mapes)
Here also I want to add some more details regarding my doubt.
One of the conditions cited for reversible change is that the process should be slow and the other one is the system shuld be in thermal equilbrium with the surroundings. Though both these conditions fail to apply in the case of adiabatic changes, gas returns to the original conditions when the operations are done in the reverse order. In the carnot's cycle both isothermal and adiabatic expansions and compressions are shown as reversible changes. So. whole theings appear to be contradictory and confusing.
 
Last edited:
ananthu said:
Does it actually happen?

Sure, it's called a hydrogen fuel cell.
 
The chemical reaction of hydrogen and oxygen releases energy, which is exactly opposite from what happens when you supply electricity (IE Energy) to split the water molecule up. Like the above post says, in a hydrogen fuel cell you can combine hydrogen and oxygen and form water and electricity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K