Rewriting Taylor Series in Sigma Notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around rewriting Taylor and Maclaurin series in sigma notation, specifically using the function f(x) = e^x and later sin(x) as examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the general form of the Maclaurin series and attempt to identify the pattern in the expanded form. Questions arise about the common elements in the terms and how to derive the sigma notation from the series expansion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided corrections and clarifications regarding the terms in the series. There is an ongoing exploration of the general term for the series and how to express it correctly in sigma notation. Multiple interpretations of the series are being examined, particularly in the context of sin(x).

Contextual Notes

Participants note missing terms in their initial attempts and question the structure of their expressions. There is a focus on ensuring the correct representation of the series without arriving at a final answer.

Stratosphere
Messages
373
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I understand the whole concept of Taylor Series and Maclaurin series but I don't know how to rewrite them in sigma notation.

I'll use this generic example. Find the Maclaurin series of the function \ f(x)=e^{x}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


\ e^{x}+\frac{1}{1!}(x-0)+\frac{1}{2!}(x-0)^{2}+\frac{1}{3!}(x-0)^{3}\cdot\cdot\cdot

I know the answer is \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{x^{n}}{n!} but I don't know how to get it from the expanded form.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stratosphere said:

Homework Statement


I understand the whole concept of Taylor Series and Maclaurin series but I don't know how to rewrite them in sigma notation.

I'll use this generic example. Find the Maclaurin series of the function \ f(x)=e^{x}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


\ e^{x}+\frac{1}{1!}(x-0)+\frac{1}{2!}(x-0)^{2}+\frac{1}{3!}(x-0)^{3}\cdot\cdot\cdot
You're missing the first term. What you have above should be
\ e^{x} = \frac{1}{0!}(x - 0)^0 + \frac{1}{1!}(x-0)+\frac{1}{2!}(x-0)^{2}+\frac{1}{3!}(x-0)^{3} + \cdot\cdot\cdot

When simplified, the expression on the right is
\ e^{x} = \frac{1}{0!}x^0 + \frac{1}{1!}x+\frac{1}{2!}x^{2}+\frac{1}{3!}x^{3}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot

What will be the general term in the sum above? Do you notice anything that's common to each of the terms above?

Stratosphere said:
I know the answer is \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{x^{n}}{n!} but I don't know how to get it from the expanded form.
 
Mark44 said:
You're missing the first term. What you have above should be
\ e^{x} = \frac{1}{0!}(x - 0)^0 + \frac{1}{1!}(x-0)+\frac{1}{2!}(x-0)^{2}+\frac{1}{3!}(x-0)^{3} + \cdot\cdot\cdot

When simplified, the expression on the right is
\ e^{x} = \frac{1}{0!}x^0 + \frac{1}{1!}x+\frac{1}{2!}x^{2}+\frac{1}{3!}x^{3}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot

What will be the general term in the sum above? Do you notice anything that's common to each of the terms above?

I noticed that there should be an x^{n} in there and there should be an n!. I guess I need to use a slightly more complicated example. How about sin(x)
The expanded form is (after the 0s are dropped out) sin(x)+\frac{1}{1!}x-\frac{1}{3!}x^{3}+\frac{1}{5!}x^{5}-\frac{1}{7!}x^{7}+\cdot\cdot\cdot.

I'll try and get an answer for this one now since I don't know the answer.

sin(x)+\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!} I know that that can't possibly be correct but that's my attempt.
 
Last edited:
You're making the same mistake you made earlier. The Maclaurin series for sin(x) should not start off with sin(x) + ... What you should be saying is that sin(x) = <the series>.

Other than that, your summation is exactly right. Here's what you have with the correction.
sin(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}
 
Mark44 said:
You're making the same mistake you made earlier. The Maclaurin series for sin(x) should not start off with sin(x) + ... What you should be saying is that sin(x) = <the series>.

Other than that, your summation is exactly right. Here's what you have with the correction.
sin(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/QUOT
Oops. I'll make note of that.

Thanks for the help though, I think I understand it now.
 
What you're doing with Taylor's series (and in this case Maclaurin series) is writing a function f(x) as a power series. For a Maclaurin series,

f(x) = f(0) + \frac{f&#039;(0)x}{1!} + \frac{f&#039;&#039;(0)x^2}{2!} + \frac{f&#039;&#039;&#039;(0)x^3}{3!} + ... + \frac{f^{(n)}(0)x^n}{n!} + ...
 
Stratosphere said:
I noticed that there should be an x^{n} in there and there should be an n!. I guess I need to use a slightly more complicated example. How about sin(x)
The expanded form is (after the 0s are dropped out) sin(x)+\frac{1}{1!}x-\frac{1}{3!}x^{3}+\frac{1}{5!}x^{5}-\frac{1}{7!}x^{7}+\cdot\cdot\cdot.
As Mark44 told you, this should be
sin(x)= \frac{1}{1!}x^2- \frac{1}{3!}x^3+ \frac{1}{5!}x^5- \frac{1}{7!}x^7+ \cdot\cdot\cdot

The first thing I would not is that the powers of x are all odd. You can write any even number as "2n" and any odd number as "2n+1", so I would try "2n+1" as as the powers and not that if n=0, 2n+1= 1, if n= 1, 2n+1= 2+ 1= 3, etc.

I would then notice that the signs alternate and think of (-1) to some power. That will alternate + and - for even and odd powers. In some cases, you might need to experiment with (-1)^n or (-1)^{n+1} to get the right parity but here I see that the first term corresponds to n= 0 and (-1)0= 1 is the right sign: I want (-1)n.

Finally, I see that the denominator is the factorial of the power- since I am writing the powers as "2n+1" I want to do the same in the denominators- each term is of the form
\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1}
and the sum is
\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1}

I'll try and get an answer for this one now since I don't know the answer.

sin(x)+\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!} I know that that can't possibly be correct but that's my attempt.[/QUOTE]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K